India Steps Up Rhetoric Against Pakistan

January 6th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Shortly after (Pakistani) terrorists bombed several targets in Mumbai, India, the Indian government made clear that it believed most terrorists to be Pakistani and / or trained in terrorist training camps in Pakistan. However, due to the delicate nature of the subject and the complex relationship between the two neighbors, both nuclear powers, India decided to launch a major investigation before accusing the Pakistani government of any wrongdoing.

It took them a while, but the Indians seem to have ended their investigation. The result: the Indian government says it is convinced that Pakistani government agencies were involved in the attacks. The terrorists, the Indians say, were aided and abetted by Pakistani government officials; without this support, the terrorists would not have been able to cause the death and destruction they caused.

Prime Minister Singh told journalists Tuesday that the terrorist attacks were of such a sophisticated nature that they could not have been carried out without support from Pakistani government agencies. Furthermore, New Delhi concludes that Pakistan-based group Lashkar-e-Taiba was behind the attacks: the Pakistani government has done little to nothing against this terrorist organization. It has, in fact, even supported it for years. 

Although Singh failed to name the exact agencies he believes to be involved, most will assume that the agency is Pakistan’s secret intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The ISI has supported extremists in India and Afghanistan for decades, believing this groups to be valuable weapons to be used against India; together with Pakistan the region’s superpower. 

The relationship between India and Pakistan has been problematic for years, it dates back to the very creation of the two states. India is a Hindu country (with a Muslim minority), whereas Pakistan is Muslim. Furthermore, some provinces of India, especially Kashmir, are inhabited by a majority Muslim population; these Muslims want to either become independent or join Pakistan. Lastly, the two sides have tried to increase their regional influence by curbing that of the other; the war between Pakistan and India has mostly been waged through proxies. Especially Pakistan has often used terrorist organizations against India; these groups have caused tremendous chaos in India, Pakistan itself and Afghanistan (a center front in the battle for regional dominance).

The terrorist attacks, Pakistan’s probably involvement and India’s rather blunt reaction to it, could very well cause an escalation. India and the United States will put pressure on Pakistan’s president to rid himself and the ISI of elements that aide and abet terrorists. This will force Islamabad to either act in an unacceptable way to India and the US or to engage in a domestic powerstruggle which could very well end up destabilizing the country. 

It is worth keeping an eye on the situation; the two countries involved are major regional and nuclear powers. It is vital for the West to have a good relationship with both and vice versa.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Wilson
    January 6th, 2009 at 20:08
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Pakistan needs to dealt with quickly or it will be chopped in half like it always gets at the hands of India. and then we’ll have a bigger problem with 3-4 states and their so-called governments.

  2. Wilson
    January 6th, 2009 at 20:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Forgive typos. Maybe we can buy Pak’s nukes then it will stop terror etc. I mean they rely on the West for food and medicine and yet they have to have nukes?

  3. John
    January 6th, 2009 at 21:12
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Nukes of Pakistan can fall in hands of terrorists. They are very unreliable. They can sell the nukes to Palestenians and Iran. Dr. Khan’s nuclear bazaar have not completely ended. US should act swiftly. With nukes in Islamic terrorists, Pakistan is the greatest threat to the US-UK-Israel trio. The Iraq, Iran, Afganistan can be dealt later on

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.