NY Times Opinionater

January 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Opinionater of the New York Times is one great blog for those who want to know what different blogs and bloggers write about the most newsworthy items of the day. Chris Suellentrop wrote for this NYT blog in the past, but he seems to have moved on to other things while his partner in crime, Tobin Harshaw still writes for it. Harshaw was joined recently by Eric Etheridge. 

One of the reasons I love the Opinionater is that we are on its very short blogroll; we’re one of only six blogs they link to. Another reason is that they are very fair to moderates, conservatives and liberals alike. Thirdly, they often find great items I missed. 

One of ‘em: ‘On Monday, Foreign Policy launched its new web site, continuing its transformation from staid quarterly to hip journal. The magazine, now owned by the Washington Post, has a snappy new homepage that looks similar to that of the snappy new Daily Beast and an ambition, FoPo blogger Tom Ricks told Politico, to bring “Politico-type coverage” to the issues of foreign policy and national security.’

The Best Defense by Thomas Ricks, a former WaPo military correspondent and author of Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq.

Madame Secretary, “an obsessive blog about Hillary Clinton,” by Carolyn O’Hara, a senior editor at the magazine.

A blog on the Midde East by Marc Lynch, professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University.

The Cable, “reporting inside the policy machine,” by Laura Rozen, who has reported on national security for Mother Jones, Washington Monthly and American Prospect.

I had missed that, but checked the blogs out instantly. 

Not only did Eric link to the blogs above but also to the new blog I’ll write for (first post will appear when I receive my log-in Andrew!): Big Hollywood.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.