PA, Israel Accept Egypt Proposal, No Word From Hamas

January 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It was reported Wednesday that both Israel and the Palestinian Authority led by Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas are willing to accept a ceasefire proposal put forth by Egypt and France. Aside from ending the war, the ceasefire agreement as proposed by Egypt would end Israel’s blockade of Gaza while Hamas would have to stop firing any rockets and carrying out any terrorist attacks against Israelis / Israel.

Although Fatah and Israel have both indicated they are willing to accept the agreement with minor changes, everyone has yet to hear from Hamas, the organization that is at the root at the conflict. Although it agreed to cease hostilities for three hours yesterday, it has yet to respond to the proposal that would, if all sides abide by it, end hostilities for years to come, creating room and time for a peaceful solution for the Middle Eastern problem, hopefully resulting in two states; Israel and a sovereign Palestine.

Hamas’ unwillingness to embrace the plan immediately makes once again clear that Hamas, not Israel, is the true aggressor. The terrorist organization welcomes all deaths; it even goes so far as to hide in schools, fire at Israeli soldiers from the building (if this is indeed what happened), and rig the building with explosives that will cause as many Palestinian children to lose their lives as possible if Israel would react violently to the attacks.

Be that as it may, Hamas has to play ball. If it does not accept the proposal or if it breaks it after a few weeks (or months), all will have been for nothing. Israel and the West as a whole have to make sure that either Hamas will be so severely weakened that it cannot attack Israel for a year (perhaps two) to come, or they have to convince Hamas’ leaders to abide by the ceasefire regardless of the group’s strength. Since Hamas’ leaders are extremists pure and simple, the second option does not seem very viable; Israel’s best hope is to weaken Hamas so severely that Fatah can take control over Gaza over. Fatah is far from perfect, but it is a better and more trustworthy negotiations partner than Hamas.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.