Republicans 2.0: A New Forum, Just for You

January 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Earlier today I linked to a new blog for moderate (conservative) Republicans: Crimson Politics. The goal of the site, which is more than a blog, is to give fiscal conservatives, moderate Republicans, moderate conservatives, libertarian conservatives, etc. a place to talk politics, unite, and take action.

One of its main tools in order to strengthen the more moderate wing of the GOP is a forum. PoliGazette and CP may join forces later on with regards to this forum; it has a very real potential to be the forum for the kind of Republicans described above. I encourage you all to head on over to this forum, to read some threads, start some of your own, and to start debating with each other. The debate options at a blog are always fairly limited since you can only talk about whatever the blogger posts. Not so with a forum; there you can take the initiative.

Some threads are already in place for those who love to debate: one about the RNC chair, another one about Bush giving medials to America’s main allies in the war against Iraq, and so on. Go there, start debating.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Crimson Politics
    January 8th, 2009 at 00:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Yes, you have nothing to lose, registering is easy and debates will get fast responses! If you disagree with something, come tell us, we’ll have a healthy debate about it.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.