Russia Blackmails Neighbors, Cuts Off Gas

January 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

In its quest to dominate the region, Russia continues to bully and blackmail neighbors who are drifting towards the West. The main tool for Russia to use in its blackmailing and bullying attempts is the region’s dependence on Russian gas. Yesterday, Moscow cut off all gas deliveries to Bulgaria, Turkey, Germany, Romania, Greece, Czech Republic and Ukraine. 

As the new moderate Republican blog Crimson Politics (it is more than a blog though: it has a forum and its goal is to help Republicans 2.0 become increasingly influential in the party) reports, Russia’s excuse to cut off all gas deliveries to these countries is that Ukraine did not pay for its gas (or tapped it illegally). Ukraine denies any wrongdoing, which is likely the truth considering the fact that it is incredibly cold in that country right now; no reasonable and moderate leader in his right mind would steal gas in the middle of the winter.

As CP’s Brian Kane points out, it is far more likely that Russia wants to punish Ukraine for its drift towards the West and its support for Georgia when the latter was brutally invaded by Russian forces. Ukraine was historically an ally of Russia, perhaps better described as a tool. The more Ukraine drifts towards the West and democracy, the less influential Russia will be in the region. Since Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev want to make Russia a super- or at least regional power, they cannot accept any independent thinking from former Soviet (satellite) states. 

It is therefore not surprising that Russia punishes Ukraine. What is surprising, however, is that Moscow also punished the other countries mentioned in this article. Germany, Turkey, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and the Czech Republic are all held hostage as well, which could mean two things: either Russia wants them to put pressure on Ukraine to give in to Russia’s demands every now and then, or it wants to let these countries know that they too are dependent on her for their well being. 

Whatever the case, Russia’s latest act of imperialism and power politics should inspire those dependent on Russian gas to develop their own energy resources. Germany especially does not need to be dependent on Russia; it can take care of itself, if only the German government is willing to ignore the demands of environmental activists who would rather make Germany dependent on a bullying and imperialistic Russia than risk killing one or two birds (research shows, by the way, that exploitation of Germany’s gas resources will do little to no damage to the environment; nonetheless, the myth of destruction of the environment is kept alive and well by Greenpeace et al.). 

Russia has shown its true face in the last year (or two), it is time for European countries to stop pretending that Moscow is or can be a friend. It is not and cannot; the Russian bear will use its strength whenever it can to oppress everyone else.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. David
    January 7th, 2009 at 20:54
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Thanks for covering this. Hungary also had its entire Russian gas supply stopped. This is probably 75% of the gas supply, the remainder being home drilled or imported from Austria. The current news is that a number of large gas users such as factories are closing today, shopping malls and similar places are adopting use reduction strategies (such as disabling automatic doors that allow too much heat out).

    Temperatures below -10C are expected at the weekend, which clearly massively increases gas heating requirements. The estimate is that Hungary has in theory 60 days of reserves, but the reserves probably cannot be pumped fast enough to cover all uses.

    The government seems to have prioritised home consumers as the last to be cut off – at gas is the main heating method this is probably wise.

  2. tony
    January 7th, 2009 at 23:43
    Reply | Quote | #2

    a clearly erroneous conclusion to assume the Ukraine is always right, and Russia is always wrong. For one, it is the ukrainian side that was refusing to allow EU monitors to be present along its pipelines while the alleged theft of gas was ongoing. Russia was allowing full EU presence at all crossing points into the ukraine, the amounts going in are fully documented. What was coming out was also measured by the EU, and noone is arguing that those amounts dropped. Yet somehow when gas disappears on the Ukrainian territory it’s Russia’s fault?

    punishment politics aside, why should a country enjoy preferential energy rates when the main product of its energy use — steel and wheat — are being sold at market rates? The ukraine saw tremendous profits from these industries (ukraine’s main exports) over the past few years, yet it did nothing to force the companies to improve energy efficiency and switch to market gas pricing. The free ride can’t last forever, and the time happens to be now.

  3. David
    January 8th, 2009 at 19:48
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I am sure that the Ukrainians are not entirely innocent of some “siphoning off” gas, but it was Russia not Ukraine which firstly reduced the flow of gas for onward pumping below the normal amounts and finally decided to stop all further gas supply entirely. Gazprom confirmed stopping gas supplies in its own press release dated Wednesday 7th January 2009. So regardless of Russian allegations of Ukrainian “theft” it was Russia which stopped supplies.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.