IDF To Expand Operation in Gaza

January 11th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It was reported this weekend that the Israeli Defense Forces plan to expand the ground operation in Gaza in order to severely weaken terrorist organization Hamas.

Hamas is weaker now than it has been in years, senior IDF officials said Sunday. They believe that as many as 300 Hamas fighters have been killed during the offensive. Entire battalions have been taken out, the IDF says. Not only have many Hamas fighters been killed or captured, many others have deserted. In fact, so many fighters have deserted, the Israeli government claims, that top Hamas figures are forced to come out of their bunkers and fight against IDF forces themselves. This has led to at least one Hamas leader in Gaza City; Izzadin Kassam, commander of Hamas’ rocket division in Gaza city was killed Saturday.

The IDF now plans to escalate the offensive, believing it may be able to deliver Hamas a death blow before any cease fire is imposed on Israel. Since Hamas seems to have been so severely weakened, Jerusalem hopes, it may be that the organization can be overthrown in Gaza altogether and replaced by Fatah.

This does mean that casualties are likely to increase in the coming days and that Gazans will have to prepare for more (aggressive) fighting. The international community, which has called on both sides to accept an immediate cease fire for two weeks now, can continue doing so, but will be ignored by the IDF until Israel’s civilian leaders decide that the objectives of the operation have been reached or that the IDF will not accomplish what it hoped to accomplish (in a reasonably amount of time).

It is interesting, by the way, that Hamas has become less vocal recently, or at least less convincing. The IDF seems to have learned from the 2006 war with Hezbollah. Hamas may be great at (producing) propaganda, but fighting real wars is not the strong suit of the Palestinian terrorist organization.

Meanwhile, all Gazans and everyone else can hope is that civilian casualties will be limited. Keeping an eye on Israel’s actions, even though the war in itself is justified, is incredibly important in this regard; that you have the right to fight a war in a specific situation does not mean you have the right to fight it whatever way you want. Civilians should be respected, and civilian casualties should, as much as possible, be prevented.

The humanitarian crisis is getting worse, Dutch news networks report, for instance. If this is true, it should be a major reason of concern; for Israel and every other country in the world. Every step has to be taken to help Gazans as much as possible; the international Red Cross should have full access to Gaza and international aide should be brought in and distributed to Palestinian civilians. Winning the war goes much further than merely beating Hamas militarily; Israel and the West also have to reach out to Palestinians, help them get through this mess and help them improve their neighborhoods, cities and towns once the war has come to an end.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bert
    January 13th, 2009 at 10:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “This has led to at least one Hamas leader in Gaza City; Izzadin Kassam, commander of Hamas’ rocket division in Gaza city was killed Saturday.”

    The man’s name was Amir Mansi, he was a senior member of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam brigades, which is the name of the armed wing of Hamas. Like the Qassam rocket, the armed wing of Hamas is named after an Islamist preacher and leader of an anti-Zionist and anti-British terrorist group in mandatory Palestine during the first half of the 1930s.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.