Inspirerer-In-Chief

January 13th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Writing for Real Clear Politics, David Shribman explains that one of President Barack Obama’s main jobs as president of all Americans will be to “inspire.” He will have done half his job, Shribman seems to believe, if he inspires American to reach new heights, in their personal and public life, and to improve themselves and the country.

It is a wonderful sentiment, but bullocks nonetheless.

A president’s main job is most certainly not to inspire; rather, it is to execute the laws accepted by Congress. Inspiring anyone is not even a distant second; the second job of the president is to take the country safe. His third job is to propose laws. Fourthly, he has to improve America’s relationship with foreign countries. Then there are many other responsibilities a president has, all of which more important than “inspiring” people.

Of course, inspiring citizens is a nice ‘plus’ for a president, but it is not an important part of the job. A man can be an incredibly dull person, but a great president nonetheless. One could even argue that dull presidents rank among the best in history.

But that on a side-note.

Shribman’s column is interesting, though, because he words the view many Americans have these days – about who they want their president to be – quite perfectly. The idea that the president should be “inspiring” is a tremendous misconception which has been fed by popular culture and ’serious commentators’ such as Mr. Shribman. It has become accepted, it seems, among Americans that their president has to “inspire” them, even though this was never his job before. The president envisioned by America’s founding fathers was most definitely not an inspiring person in any way whatsoever. It was a technocrat who simply favored enabling people to live as they wanted to live, and to be what and who they wanted to be. A president had to execute laws and refrain from doing anything else.

The new president, however, which has developed in the 20th century, is an entirely different animal altogether. It is a fascinating, but still possibly dangerous, development.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Crimson Politics
    January 13th, 2009 at 23:31
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Inspire ? Obama is as inspiring as a snail making it’s way on a sidewalk. There’s nothing inspiring about the guy, his words to me do not make me wanna go and work harder or do something amazing.

    If you want inspiring, read Albert Einsteins biography, or Thomas Edison, or some other figure in the past who has ACCOMPLISHED something. Winning an election is not an accomplishment that inspires people.

    Certain presidents are inspiring AFTER they leave office, yet somehow people assume Barack Obama is inspiring even though he has done nothing for the United States so far.

  2. c3
    January 14th, 2009 at 20:12
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Crimson;
    C’mon. He’s not inspiring to you but clearly to others.

    Michael;
    Yes, inspiration (or better put motivation) is a task of the office. Having said that (and to use an example of a critique of GWB from the past term) I would bet the folks in New Orleans were less interested in inspiration after Katrina and more interested food, clothing and shelter.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.