UN Admits: Schools in Gaza Employed Terrorists

January 15th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

When Israeli forces shelled a UN school in Gaza last week, Israel faced a lot of criticism, including by yours truly. The Jewish nation-state said that Hamas terrorists used the school as a military basis, hiding in it and firing at Israeli forces from it. The UN, however, said this was not the case, or could not have been the case. Many argued that attacking schools was per definition not done, while people like me argued that Israel should have given those in the school the opportunity to get out before it was attacked.

Today Fox News adds important information to the debate by reporting that UN officials admit that its schools in Gaza employed Hamas and Islamic Jihad fighters (terrorists) in the past and that the schools provide textbooks to children that contain hate speech and other incendiary information.

The schools are administered by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which has been criticized before. This time around, however, the criticism is more severe than ever before, and quite rightfully so indeed.

Rep. Steve Rothman, D-N.J., introduced a resolution in the fall calling for greater transparency and accountability at UNRWA. The bill called on the agency to make its textbooks available on the Internet for public inspection and to implement “terrorist name recognition software and other screening procedures that would help to ensure that UNRWA staff, volunteers, and beneficiaries are neither terrorists themselves, nor affiliated with known terrorist organizations.”

He told Fox that he plans to re-introduce the resolution this week because, “as timely as this bill was before, it is even more timely now. It is urgent that Congress can be assured that U.S. taxpayer money is not being spent to support Hamas and its murderous activities.”

The network explains: ‘There have been several high-profile examples of terrorists being employed by UNRWA. Former top Islamic Jihad rocket maker Awad Al-Qiq, who was killed in an Israeli air strike last May, was the headmaster and science instructor at an UNRWA school in Rafah, Gaza. Said Siyam, Hamas’ interior minister and head of the Executive Force, was a teacher for over two decades in UNRWA schools.’

The situation has become so grave, in fact, that children educated at UNRWA schools are more likely to become suicide bombers than those who are not.

Of course, the report does not mean that Israel was right to attack the school in the way it did, but it does put the whole episode in perspective. The UN admits that it does not check its Palestinian employees; if they say they do not belong to any extremist organization, the UN takes it at face value. Since terrorists are more than willing to lie about their affiliations, this system is not exactly bulletproof.

This makes Israel’s explanation of what happened more likely; even in the eyes of those who tend to be highly critical of the Jewish nation-state.

An important point should be made, however; even if the school employed terrorists who were firing at IDF troops, and even if it was providing children with textbooks that contained anti-Jewish information, Israel could have opted to simply surround the building, give those inside a chance to come out, and attack it a bit later.

Also be sure to read this post at Crimson Politics.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. CMCSanDiego
    January 16th, 2009 at 21:28
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I saw a YouTube video yesterday, of footage evidently provided by the Israeli Defense Forces which showed a Hamas mortar team setting up a mortar and firing it from the school grounds, then the men disappeared into the neighborhood. The video also shows and quotes Hamas leaders saying that they will use civilian shields, then numerous video examples of them doing so. I shows the weapons found in Mosques, and the booby traps set up in residential areas and hospitals. In my mind if the Palestinians are anxious to have their residential areas left alone by the Israelis then they need to step up and shoot any Hamas fighters who attempt to bring weapons into them, or fire from them. Otherwise those areas will continue to be used as staging areas and continue to be destroyed. More discussion of Hamas’ flagrant violations of the Geneva Convention needs to happen in the media.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.