Israel Plans Unilateral Cease-Fire

January 17th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Israeli government officials told CNN that the cabinet led by Ehud Olmert plans to announce a unilateral cease-fire Saturday night. The officials added that Israel insists it retains the right to respond violently to rocket attacks.

The report came shortly after Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak joined a growing chorus calling on both sides to accept an immediate cease-fire. Cynics may believe that Mubarak spoke out so strongly in favor of a cease-fire, after weeks of criticizing Hamas, because Israel informed him it would implement a unilateral cease-fire hours later.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon also called on Israel to finally accept a cease-fire. “The level of violence in Gaza is unprecedented,” the U.N. chief said. “The Israeli aerial and land offensives against Hamas targets are inflicting heavy civilian casualties, widespread destruction and tremendous suffering for the entire region.”

Ban continued to criticize Israel for the level of violence used against Hamas and other Palestinians. He said that yet another UN compound was bombed by Israel and called on the Jewish nation-state to investigate the matter and to punish those responsible. Israel attacked another UN school in Gaza early Saturday, resulting in the deaths of two young boys.

Operation Cast Lead, as Israel’s operation against Hamas is called, has resulted in the deaths of 1,203 Palestinians. 5,000 more were wounded. Estimations indicate that 50% of those killed were civilians and 410 children.

Israel has suffered much less; only 10 soldiers and three civilians have been killed in the fighting.

Meanwhile, the organization primarily responsible for the violence, Hamas, says it will continue to attack Israel, regardless of whether or not Israel announces a cease-fire today. The organization’s spokesmen said the cease-fire is unacceptable because it will not mention a full withdrawal from Gaza and because it will not mention ‘of lifting its crippling blockade off the strip.’

“This unilateral ceasefire does not foresee a withdrawal” by the Israeli army,  Osama Hemdan, the movement’s Lebanon representative, told Al Arabiya.

“As long as it remains in Gaza, resistance and confrontation will continue,” he said, adding Israel’s proposal for a unilateral ceasefire was an “attempt to derail the Egyptian plan” for a reciprocal truce.

“If they insist on this (unilateral ceasefire) position it means that they don’t want to let Egypt have success on the regional and international levels,” Hemdan said.

It is a nice attempt to court Egypt, of course. The reality of the situation seems to be quite the opposite however; Mubarak called for a cease-fire Saturday, followed a few hours later by an announcement from Jerusalem that it will indeed announce a unilateral cease-fire this weekend. It is obvious that both Egypt and Israel coordinated their actions.

The international community will undoubtedly call on Israel to withdraw ASAP from Gaza. As long as Israel does not do so, it will be criticized and blamed for the violence. If Israel withdraws, however, and Hamas continues to attack, Hamas will face increasingly more negative coverage in the press.

Meanwhile, the blockade is a difficult subject for anyone to talk about; the blockade is rather obviously an attempt by Israel to prevent weapons from being smuggled into Gaza. As we saw in the last year and especially in the last 22 days, however, the blockade has not been very effective: Hamas had many hundreds of rockets and thousands of other weapons.

The blockade does cause tremendous suffering to average Palestinians, however. It is difficult for them to travel, impossible even, and it is impossible for them to create a flourishing economy. The blockade does not damage than it does good; as such, it makes perfect sense for Israel to finally end it. If Hamas continues to attack Israeli civilians, as it likely will, Israel has a strong case for another military operation and it will be difficult for the international community to blame the victim (Israel) yet again for the violence.

More here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. amir
    January 18th, 2009 at 00:54
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Dear All, Israel has killed 1205 innocent people 400 kids, 200 womens , 109 over 60years age , Injured 5000 people ,, what kind of war is this, Israel is using weapons like Dense Inert Metal Explosive which is unacceptable by law , cant you all see whats heppening to palestinians ,please be fair , israel is using the media to cover its war while palestinians dies per thousands, please wake up and protect these innocent people

  2. vb
    January 18th, 2009 at 01:16
    Reply | Quote | #2

    @amir
    Oh please. All that Hamas had to do to protect the innocent people was to stop firing rockets at the innocent people in Israel. The same day that that would happen, Israel would have left and never come back to Gaza.

  3. simon
    January 18th, 2009 at 02:39
    Reply | Quote | #3

    @amir
    1200 innocent people? you’ve gotta be joking. At least 1000 of them are murderous hamas men and some of their families who they use as human shields. And 65% of the rest of the “innocent” civilians and their families voted for hamas. Pay back is a bitch! So sad that Israel has to “take out” the arab world’s garbage, Hamas. The arab moderates should be grateful, but they are cowards, afraid to speak out for justice.

  4. vince
    January 18th, 2009 at 03:06
    Reply | Quote | #4

    it was clearly not feasible for hamas to stop firing. admitting defeat would have proved that disproportionate and hugely destructive and indiscriminate force is effective in negotiation (just as paying a terrorists ransom does). its called moral hazard. if they stopped firing, all future negotiations would be won by israel threatening, if not actually using another unacceptable offensive.
    and amir, i hope you don’t pretend that you support democracy. voter does not equal terrorist. and i wouldn’t bother trying to console yourself that ‘1000 of them are murderous hamas men and some of their families who they use as human shields’. don’t insult the people of gaza. its bad enough theyve been made economically destitute for years by israel and had their vital infrastructure and hopes of livelihoods destroyed without clowns like you suggesting most of them are murderous hateful people who want anything more than just to overcome the day to day struggles of affording meals and schooling, as in most other poor areas of the world. its all good and nice to be political and pigeonhole populations as malicious when you sit in a 1st world armchair, but don’t doubt that getting on with their lives is far more important than notions of trying to erase the state of israel. hamas are of course not blameless but israel couldn’t honestly expect them to stop firing. its their last shot at knocking the crap out of palestine on bush’s watch. he won’t be complaining.

  5. vince
    January 18th, 2009 at 03:07
    Reply | Quote | #5

    sorry, the second comment was in response to simon, not amir.
    thanks

  6. amir
    January 20th, 2009 at 09:56
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Simon, dont know which war exactly you are watching to say that 1000 are from hammas , i really dont have a word to reply on that, 700 of these 1200 are childrens and womens , and i dont think childrens are Hammas military !!! and stop using your ugly words in such a conversation , its obvious that you know nothing about this war and you even cant go in a moderate conversation while you are talking about arabs mdoerate, look at yourself first.
    and for all, what exactly is the main reason for this war is it hammas? , is it hammas that closed all Gazza gates is it hammas that stopped food and human aid from entering to gazza that people their are not having electricity to even make some hot foods for their poor childrens, these rockets are all reactions to what Israel is making ,, stop taking their lands and raping their wrights in living safely and you will be safe from rockets.

  7. Jason, Managing Editor
    January 20th, 2009 at 16:11
    Reply | Quote | #7

    stop taking their lands and raping their wrights in living safely and you will be safe from rockets

    Unfortunately, while everything you say about Israel’s bad policies towards Palestinians is true, this last line is untrue. Hamas has written into its founding charter a commitment to the genocidal destruction of Israel and all Jews. Even if Israel were to lift the blockade and allow economic aid and development to flow into Gaza, Hamas would remain genocidal in its goals and would inevitably find ways to act on those goals. So let’s not lie to people and claim Hamas is only reacting to Israel. Hamas is also an aggressor whenever it sees the opportunity.

    P.S. Many of those 1000 Palestinians would not have died if Hamas had not used them as human shields.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.