What To Hope For…

January 20th, 2009 By: Arvak | Tags:

During his campaign, Barack Obama championed the cause of “hope” and “change”.  What exactly that “change” would be made of was a source of much controversy, as critics highlighted a persistent vagueness and even vacuity in Obama’s rhetoric.

During an unusually calm transition period (made possible, it should be pointed out, by a remarkably non-partisan and even downright classy approach from the outgoing Bush administration), now-President Obama has sent many promising signals that give moderates and even some conservatives cause to sign on to the “hope” and “change” mantra.  With relatively few exceptions like the Labor Department, President Obama has appointed technocratic pragmatists to many key positions.  His economic appointments in particular have been well-qualified and apparently resistent to the kind of dramatic swings and vacillations that came from the Bush economic team throughout 2008.  And the retention of Defense Secretary Robert Gates promises to provide President Obama with a much more smooth relationship with a skeptical military leadership than was possible with President Clinton’s early missteps.

President Obama’s overt efforts to reach out to Republicans also promise to short-circuit, at least in part, the toxic atmosphere of partisan demonization that has persisted ever since the far left refused to accept the 2000 election.  Obama’s centrist appointments, his refusal to participate in the one-last-shot Bush-bashing glee and his “one president at a time” deference to the Bush administration on economic and foreign policy topics has been a source of great frustration for the BDS brigades, but it is precisely his willingness to annoy the far left that makes his outreach efforts to moderate conservatives seem credible. According to The Moderate Voice, President Obama offers the best chance yet to really transcend the culture of partisan mutually assured destruction that has infested the core of American politics for a generation.

If President Obama and his administration continue a centrist, pragmatic pattern, he offers the best possible chance to produce a critically needed psychological boost, unifying the country in a time of economic and security peril.  Like Franklin Delano Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan, President Obama could prove to be an epocal leader at exactly the right time.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.