I’m Good

January 22nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Both our very own Marc Moore and The Moderate Voices Pete Abel took a quiz to test their knowledge of the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I took the quiz as well; it sounded interesting, so I gave it a try. I decided not to post the results in the comment section because, well, because I performed remarkably well.*

This young Dutchman beat both old Americans (just kidding guys) with ease; Marc got only 23 of 30 questions right, Pete 25. I, however, got…

29 right.

Yeah baby, I’m good.

Proof:
Answer to question 21:

Correct! The best answer is B.

The First Amendment only prohibits government officials from endorsing or promoting a particular religion. It does not prohibit students from doing so on their own. For example, while it would be unlawful for a public school teacher to have his class recite the Lord’s Prayer prior to handing out a test, nothing prohibits his students from quietly praying on their own.

Results so far: 21 of 21 correct.

But then:
Answer to question 24:

Incorrect. The best answer is B. (You chose ‘A’)

Court have consistently struck down so-called campus or school “speech codes” that seek to limit lawful speech that many listeners would nevertheless find offensive. As one federal appeals court judge noted in striking down a public school district’s student speech code: “There is no categorical ‘harassment exception’ to the First Amendment’s free speech clause…. [While] non-expressive, physically harassing conduct is entirely outside the ambit of the free speech clause…there is…no question that the free speech clause protects a wide variety of speech that listeners may consider deeply offensive, including statements that impugn another’s race or national origin or that denigrate religious beliefs.” Saxe v. State College Area School District (3rd Cir. 2001).

More

Answer to question 30:

Correct! The best answer is A.

The First Amendment does not protect an individual’s right to publish deceptive or misleading ads. The First Amendment does protect — to at least some degree — the other listed types of speech.

Results so far: 29 of 30 correct.

Concluding:

That’s it!

Thank you for using the SPLC’s Test Your Knowledge of the First Amendment. You answered 29 of 30 questions correctly…
28 and above: Outstanding! James Madison and Company would be very proud. CENSORS BEWARE!

Yeah baby, yeah!

* I did, in fact, decide to post the results before finishing the quiz, but the first paragraph worked out better (read: more arrogant) by pretending I decided to post it after I was done because of the great results.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. marc
    January 22nd, 2009 at 23:45
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I am humbled!

  2. Michael van der Galien
    January 23rd, 2009 at 00:58
    Reply | Quote | #2

    yeah… the only problem; I’m living in the Netherlands…

  3. David
    January 23rd, 2009 at 14:34
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Hey, I got 27 and I’m not American (I’ve never even been to the US).

    If it is foreigners vs Americans I think we could win :)

  4. Jason, Managing Editor
    January 23rd, 2009 at 15:48
    Reply | Quote | #4

    30 out of 30 here.

    Keep trying, Michael. You’ll catch me eventually. :) Or not.

  5. C Stanley
    January 23rd, 2009 at 16:24
    Reply | Quote | #5

    I’d say it’s a dead heat between you two for the ‘humility’ award though.:-)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.