Obama Moves to Close Guantanamo Bay, CIA Prisons

January 22nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

As one of his first acts in office, President Barack Obama ordered the closure of American prison on Cuba, Guantanamo Bay and other prisons abroad used to hold terrorists. In response, Congressman Jack Murtha of Pennsylvania said he was more than willing to house Gitmo prisoners in his district.

Conservative bloggers responded with outrage. How can Murtha put the lives of his constituents at risk? They cannot possibly accept their Congressman’s plans, can they?

Unlike what these bloggers seem to believe, Murtha did say he would give the prisoners a nice home, a well-paid job and a dog. Rather, he said he is willing to put Gitmo prisoners in ‘high security prisons’ in his district. These prions are used to protect society from serial killers, serial rapists and psychopaths. These prisons are designed to ensure that prisoners remain where they are, are unable to escape, and unable to cause major trouble in the building itself. Put differently, there’s no way that terrorists can escape from these facilities.

The reason to lock these suspected terrorists (innocent until proven guilty was thrown overboard years ago for them) up in prisons outside of the U.S. was not because they could cause ‘no harm’ there or because America’s prisons aren’t secure. Rather, White House legal experts thought these suspects did not have the same rights in Guantanamo Bay as they would have if imprisoned in the U.S. itself. Courts decided different, however. It is logical that these terrorists are, therefore, moved to the U.S. where they can be brought to justice.

Although certainly no fan of Obama, his decision to close Guantanamo Bay – it will be closed completely one year from now – and prisons abroad used by the CIA to hold and interrogate suspected terrorists, is wise. America’s image abroad has been hurt tremendously by Gitmo, Abu Ghraib and all other prisons; America pretends to stand for certain rights but withholds them from its enemies making it look rather hypocritical. Even conservative Europeans, who generally favor the U.S., were aghast at the U.S. treatment of said suspects. Closing these prisons isn’t merely just, it is also an easy way to boost America’s image and popularity.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ahrcanum
    January 23rd, 2009 at 01:48
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Under an Obama transparency in government, I wonder where,exactly are the other ‘prisons’? If detainees are housed in Military facilities, do the same Constitutional rules apply?

  2. Crimson Politics
    January 23rd, 2009 at 02:22
    Reply | Quote | #2

    The fear is that they will get released by lawyers who will have an easy time proving that their clients are innocent because of the mere lack of evidence (which is lost due to time and witnesses not being available).

  3. coffee
    January 23rd, 2009 at 21:14
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Obama is smart on so many levels for ordering the closure of Guantanamo. It has been a long time coming

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.