No Guantanamo Bay Prisoners Files

January 25th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Washington Post reports that the Barack Obama administration has run into a major problem: there are no comprehensive files about Guantanamo Bay prisoners. Team Obama searched for these files in order to assess the danger posed by every individual suspect and to design an individual plan for every detainee. Since the files do not exist, at least not according to Obama officials, it is difficult to release suspects and / or to come up with ways to move them so that the prison camp can be closed as Obama ordered last week.

Some former Bush officials say that the files do exist but that Team Obama is simply looking for excuses not to close Guantanamo Bay any time soon due to the complexity of the issue. They believe that Obama et alia realize that closing Gitmo requires a more nuances approach than they anticipated, meaning they will take it slow. Since the liberal wing of the Democratic Party will not accept any delay, however, Team Obama has come up with the ‘no files exist’ excuse.

Other former Bush officials, however, agree that comprehensive files do indeed not exist. They told the WaPo that different agencies have assembled different information about the same suspects and are reluctant to share the information with each other. This means that Team Obama has to collect all available information, review it, put it together in separate files and then use it to design plans for every individual detainee. Such a process will take many months to complete.

It is interesting that the Bush administration believed it had the right to detain terrorism suspects indefinitely, without assembling a comprehensive file on them. The administration itself may not have known why specific individuals were detained, why they weren’t brought to justice, and why they posed a danger to the United States.

In any case, the above means that Obama will have to take his time with both closing Gitmo and with deciding what to do about the prison’s detainees. 60 of them are considered too dangerous for release. The rest can be set free, the question is where and when. Will they be brought back to the country in which they were captured, or their own native country, or will the U.S. accept (some of) them?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    January 26th, 2009 at 00:36
    Reply | Quote | #1

    If what the Bush officials say is true, what happened to all the dismantling of “the wall” between law enforcement and intelligence? Was it that significantly reinstated when Patriot Act II was passed? I didn’t think the changes were all that significant in the second version to affect this. Some things were removed but many were kept.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.