Luddites Win; Senate Votes to Delay Digital TV
At the urging of the new Obama administration, the U.S. Senate has voted to delay the nation’s transition to digital television for 4 months. The reason?
“The Nielsen Co. estimates that more than 6.5 million U.S. households that rely on analog television sets to pick up over-the-air broadcast signals could see their TV sets go dark next month if the transition is not postponed.”
I’m supposed to care, I suppose, given that the president has made this one of his first acts. But we had several years worth of advance warning to prepare for this moment. There’s no reason to back off now, least of all because a few holdouts refuse to make the first required upgrade to their television sets since, well, forever.
Is this why the Obama administration decided to push for the delay in the face of all reason?
Gene Kimmelman, vice president for federal policy at Consumers Union, argues that millions of Americans — particularly low-income and elderly viewers — will pay the price because “the government has failed to deliver the converter boxes these people deserve just to keep watching free, over-the-air broadcast signals.”
It is an absolutely critical insight that Kimmelman accidentally gives into the liberal mind. The government, being responsible for providing all forms of succor to its helpless citizens, has failed by not giving them what they deserve – deserve! – as their right, just for breathing.
Understand this and you understand everything that is wrong in western democracy.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
Why, may I ask, is the government mandating how broadcasts are made? Is analog broadcasting a threat to health or security of the nation? If many people want that product (and still have the equipment to receive it) why the mandated change? It reminds me of the Microsoft XP to Vista debacle people are staying away from buying computers in droves because they are being forced into something they don’t want. Responsible government would stay out of the way of market demand, and responsible companies would provide whatever the public wishes for it’s consumption. Remember “the customer is always right.”