Putin To West: We Tried Socialism, Didn’t Work

January 29th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

In what’s quite a surprising development, Russian Prime Minister and former President Vladimir Putin warned the West not bail out too many companies and to stop interfering in their economies.

“Interference of the State, the belief in the omnipotence of the State: that is a reaction to market failures,” Mr Putin said in his keynote address at the opening of the four-day meeting. “There is a temptation to expand direct interference of state in economy. In the Soviet Union that became an absolute. We paid a very dear price for that.”

Putin’s words are surprising because he and President Dmitry Medvedev have started copying the behavior of the Soviet Union in quite some ways. It is clear that Putin believes that interference in the economy was the Soviet Union’s true mistake (about which he is probably correct; the Soviet Union would have been a far more dangerous adversary if it would have developed a free and strong market economy).

It’s also surprising because Putin doesn’t normally about other countries. The world has changed however; we have all become increasingly dependent on each other. If Western economies crumble, Russia too will suffer.

There’s another (domestic) aspect to Putin’s remarks; the Russian economy too has suffered major blows in the last year or so. It’s likely that many Russians want their government to do what the American government did yesterday; invest heavily in the economy. Russians are more used to an active government than Americans are – when the going gets rough, people want what they know, no matter how destructive it has been in the past.

Putin may not be speaking as much to the West as he speaking directly to those Russians. He makes clear to them that he believes that bailout and major stimulus packages will hurt the economy in the long run.

And he’s right.

Western lawmakers are in serious trouble when a Russian leader tells them they are interfering too much in the markets. It’s a sign that they’re overreaching. Republicans understood this, as did 11 Democrats; the majority of them, however, voted for a bill that would make Americans more dependent on the government, that hurts the economy in the short to middle run and does little to nothing in the long run. Other Western governments could follow suit, although most ’stimulus packages’ consist out of merely bailout out banks in Europe. At this point in time, that is. Now that America passed a major stimulus package, European laborites and socialists will undoubtedly demand their governments do the same.

If so, we’re all putting a tremendous burden on ourselves, our children and our grandchildren.

Lets listen to Putin for once.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Daniel
    January 29th, 2009 at 19:55
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What’s amazing to me is that US officials always preach capitalism and warn developing governments to not interfere in their economy but here we are doing exactly what we tell other nations not to do.

    I agree we should listen.

  2. marc
    January 29th, 2009 at 22:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Principles are all well and good to talk about until one gets scared. Then it becomes apparent how much or how little you believe in what you’ve been saying. The big question with the stimulus “loan” we’re talking about is when it will be paid back. Never, I suspect.

  3. c3
    January 30th, 2009 at 01:29
    Reply | Quote | #3

    pot, meet kettle.

  4. velda
    January 30th, 2009 at 03:03
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Wow. Spending a few months in Russia several years back was enough to turn me solidly against socialism. Their economy was more than a little rough at that time though, and it seems alot of people there wanted their old ways back. Glad to here Putin’s speaking up!

  5. Ken
    February 17th, 2009 at 19:19
    Reply | Quote | #7

    I never in my most horrific nightmares expected to see the day when a former head of the KGB would be to the RIGHT of a President of the United States. Sadly, that day has arrived. How soon before we are the USSA? (United Socialist States of America)

  6. Cleopheus Williams
    February 21st, 2009 at 20:10
    Reply | Quote | #8

    “the Soviet Union would have been a far more dangerous adversary if it would have developed a free and strong market economy’

    The very reason we need to keep an eye on free market China.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.