Pajamas Media Reforms; No More Ads. Too Bad, It’s Called ‘Business’

January 31st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The conservative blogosphere was set ablaze late yesterday after Protein Wisdom’s Jeff Goldstein published a post about Pajamas Media’s decision to do away with its ad network. Goldstein was informed about this decision after PJM sent him an e-mail announcing the changes.

To say that the email angered Goldstein is a slight understatement. He – and others like Ace of Spades – feel betrayed by Pajamas Media. They became dependent on this ad network for their revenue; if PJM stops, and it will April 1 of this year, they’ll face major financial issues.

Quite some bloggers had to tell former advertisers they could no longer do business with them in order to join PJM years ago, when PJM was created.

Like every blogger using PJM ads, I received the same email as Goldstein. Although it’s always sad when the time has come for two business partners to go say goodbye and move on, I don’t quite understand how PJM can make anyone feel betrayed. As Rick Moran argues for Right Wing Nut House, PJM and bloggers have a business contract with each other. The one offers the other something, and vice versa. At the time of signing the contract, all involved thought they would be better off. If this system does no longer work (or at least not as well as other business models) for PJM, however, it doesn’t make sense for them to keep pumping money into blogs – not into Ace of Spades, nor into Protein Wisdom, and, finally, not into PoliGazette.

PJM is a business enterprise. Its first and foremost goal is to make as much money, as high a profit as it can. Its managers believe more money can be made by producing more Internet television – PJTV. Whether they are right or wrong remains to be seen. All that matters is that they have every right to change their business model.

As for me, I enjoyed working with PJM: it resulted in me getting paid a fair amount of money every quarter, which is great for every blogger, albeit especially for a blogger who also happens to be a student. There are, however, other ways to make money through ads. We had PJM, it made me money which was great, but I now look forward to working with other companies who believe investing in / advertising on blogs helps their business.

I created a BlogAds account only two weeks ago or so – I’m pretty sure this will help me sell advertising space. And if that doesn’t work out, I’ll focus on other ways to earn money – there are always opportunities to make money for those who persist.

Lastly, as I understand it, PJM will continue to publish articles – it’s just the ad network that will cease to exist. My understanding is that I will continue writing articles for them. Those articles too are based on a business agreement; they think that my articles add something to their site, I believe the money they pay me is enough for the product I produce (=article).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Americaneocon
    January 31st, 2009 at 20:29
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Michael: I wrote about this as well, from the perspective of a self-supporting “9th-tier” blogger and aspiring public intellectual. Rick Moran nails, and good work here as well.

  2. Crimson Politics
    January 31st, 2009 at 22:59
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Go with Google Adsense.
    And it is good that PJM ad network is going away. They didn’t have any interesting ads in my opinion and it seemed like the same ones over and over. They also seemed to funding a lot of really crappy conservative blogs, that really don’t deserve to exist.

  3. marc
    February 1st, 2009 at 01:56
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Aside from slightly higher ad income the PJ network didn’t add much, if anything, to the blogs it signed. Hard to say what promises might have been made to any of the affected writers, but you’re certainly right that in the absence of a specific agreement it’s Simon’s right to do whatever he wants with his company’s direction.

    Michael, perhaps you could inform your contributors what, if any, impact this will have on the PoliGazette. Off-line, of course.

  4. Michael Merritt
    February 1st, 2009 at 05:35
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Probably for the best. Now you can select what ads you wish to use.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.