Google Bug Proves Dependence Of All of Us

February 1st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Earlier Saturday, Google suffered from a major bug: every website found by Internet users through Google had a warning that the site contained potentially harmful software. Many millions of  users were unable to click on links found by Googleś search engine.

It is thought the site had erroneously identified all other websites – and some of its own pages – as containing malicious software or ‘malware’.

The glitch, which prevented internet users from directly clicking through to search results, was fixed within 30 minutes although users of Google’s email service Gmail have since reported finding genuine messages sent mistakenly to spam folders.

The errors prompted panic among web surfers who at first feared the popular search engine had suffered some kind of major failure that could have had serious implications for internet commerce.

The Google search page is by far the most popular on the internet, with the overall site receiving several hundred million queries each day. It is the most common homepage and accounts for almost four out of every five internet searches, making it a crucial part of the global economy.

Google fixed the glitch within 30 minutes. Gmail, however, continued to suffer from bugs a while longer.

Today’s prove more than anything else that we have all become highly dependent on Google. That is not necessarily a problem, but when Google stops functioning (well) it is. Allowing oneself to depend on one website is never wise; even if the website involved is considered highly reliable.

One usesr wrote on her Twitter that she was panicking until she remembered this other search engine, mentioned to her years ago: Yahoo! Yahoo may not be as good as Google but it certainly is a good number two. There are also other options out there; search engines are developed all the time.

None of them are as good as Google, but they function well – there’s no need to become too dependent on the world’s most popular search engine.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    February 1st, 2009 at 20:04
    Reply | Quote | #1

    It’s been a horrible internet day for Spain overall. Not only the google glitch, YouTube and other major sites have been timing out on Spanish users all day. Our dominant service provider must have messed something up and as a result its been a dismal internet day.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.