NYT Calls for Daschle to Step Aside

February 3rd, 2009 By: Orson Buggeigh | Tags:

You know the ethical problems are serious when the cheerleader for your own team says it is time to go.  Tom Daschle has tax problems, and worked for the health industry after leaving the Senate – all of which are good reasons why many independents and Republicans believe he ought not become Secretary of Health & Human Services.  Now the New York Times is editorializing that Daschle’s problems are serious enough so that he should not become Secretary of HHS.

I rarely agree with much in the NYT, but for once they have actually said the honest thing without too much prodding.  The problem for the Obama administration is that the Hope and Change (TM) promised is proving to be the same old corrupt politics as usual.  Richardson, Geithner, Holder, Daschle – if this is the best the Democrats can put forward, it should make some of the people who have been constant critics of the Bush administration embarassed.  Because it would seem to indicate one of two things, both of which are quite unsavory:

(1)  Most politicians are corrupted by the process at this level.  To put it crudely, politicians need to be changed frequently for the same reason baby’s diapers need to be changed frequently. If this is true, then there really isn’t much difference between the Democrats and the Republicans, except for the special interest groups buying and selling the congressmen.

(2)  If there are a fair number of reasonably honest politicans in government, why hasn’t the Obama team done a better job of selecting them for his cabinet?  This group seems to contain a lot of high profile problems.  If there are plenty of honest politicians, and Obama hasn’t chosen them, it seems to indicate that he really is not ready for the Oval Office, and he is being guided by less than scrupulous people.  Say – wasn’t that the popular charge about Vice President Cheney and Karl Rove for the past eight years?  Oh – see the last sentence of point (1) above.

This transition, despite all the cheer leading from the media, and all the enthusiasm from the public, has gotten off to a rough start which makes the previous Bush administration look like a well-oiled machine.  On second thought, perhaps references to ‘machine’ and the Obama administration aren’t especially helpful.

Seriously, the President needs to take charge, and that includes telling some of his supporters that they will be disappointed, because he will appoint competent people, regardless of party, and he will hold them accountable.  He won’t be selecting party cronies and personal pals.  There is a precident for that:  Fiorello Laguardia, who ran for Mayor of New York, won, and then thanked everyone who voted for him, and told them he would show his ingratitude by not appointing them to city offices. He tried to get the best people for the jobs.  He was not always successful, but he seems to have had the right idea.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Hilary Smith
    February 3rd, 2009 at 20:20
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What’s happening now should make us all the more proud that we had the good sense to elect someone like Obama. Americans, because now we’re paying attention, are demanding clean leadership. Political leaders have become corrupt because by-and-large Americans have been too distracted to care about politics. But now we’ve been turned on. Obama might have a hard time finding anyone with any real “experience” who doesn’t have blood on their hands, if you will. He might have to fill his cabinet with nubies. Fine with me at this point.

  2. c3
    February 4th, 2009 at 06:30
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Hilary;
    Agreed. Clearly President Obama is like a shining beacon bringing light to the evil darkness that is Washington.

  3. C Stanley
    February 4th, 2009 at 14:07
    Reply | Quote | #3

    LOL, c3. I guess Obama watching is similar to climate changes now (in that everything one way or another is claimed to be proof of AGW.)

    Obama is successful in something he promised to do and it’s proof of why it was so important for us to have elected him.

    Obama’s plans get thwarted, and that’s again proof of why it was so important for us to have elected him.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.