IBM to Relocate Laid-off Workers to India, Elsewhere

February 5th, 2009 By: marc moore | Tags:

IBM has been shedding employees at a rapid rate in the last few years as its mainframe computer and consulting businesses struggle to compete.  In a novel twist, it’s new Project Match program will move some adventurous Americans overseas to be closer to new, lower-paid information technology workers.


“IBM has established Project Match to help you locate potential job opportunities in growth markets where your skills are in demand,” IBM says in an internal notice on the initiative. “Should you accept a position in one of these countries, IBM offers financial assistance to offset moving costs, provides immigration support, such as visa assistance, and other support to help ease the transition of an international move.”

InformationWeek says:

The climate is warm, there’s no shortage of exotic food, and the cost of living is rock bottom. That’s IBM’s pitch to the laid-off American workers it’s offering to place in India. The catch: Wages in the country are pennies-on-the-dollar compared to U.S. salaries.

The upside is that the cost of living is also much lower there, making the move potentially very interesting to some workers, especially during a recession at home. 

“It’s more of a vehicle for people who want to expand their life experience by working somewhere else,” said the spokesman. “A lot of people want to work in India.”

I think taking advantage of such an opportunity would be a really cool thing to do, especially if one is young and/or childless.  Working for a couple years in a foreign, exotic locale would be a source of some great life experience.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. David
    February 5th, 2009 at 14:27
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Just don’t count on going back to the US on your Indian pension at the end of it all…..

  2. Jay
    February 5th, 2009 at 19:20
    Reply | Quote | #2

    THE NEW TREASURY SECRETARY GEITHNER WAS EDUCATED IN INDIA. YALE UNIVERSITY FOUNDER WAS BORN AND EDUCATED IN INDIA. PEW FOUDATION POLL SAYS AMERICANS ARE MOST(60%+) ADMIRED IN INDIA. FOOD, SHELTER, EDUCATION, HEALTHCARE, ALL COST PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR IN INDIA. THAT IS WHY INDIA PRODUCES SO MANY TECHIES AND IBM HAS MADE IT ITS SECOND HOME. FIVE BEDROOM HOME AND THREE CAR GARAGE, GAS GUZZLERS ETC. ARE OUT.

  3. laid-off ibmer
    February 6th, 2009 at 18:08
    Reply | Quote | #3

    The info on Project Match that was included in my “resource action” package offered NO help in getting back to the US since it requires that you be hired by IBM Russia, IBM India, etc and have NO connection to IBM US. And it’s only available to the 5000+ people in this layoff group — of which, few are in their 20s and likely to be even interested in an “adventure” where they are “helped” to go to a country where they don’t speak the language, where they are likely to be resented as taking a job away from a local, and where they have to VERY quickly learn local customs, find housing, etc… IBM is offering to dump them in the country with “help” moving them and with visa assistance so they arrive with a promise of a job and nothing else (and no guarantee of a job in 6 months).

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.