Elections in Israel; Both Likud and Kadima Declare Themselves the Winner

February 11th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Jpost reports:

In the hours after television exit polls predicted that Kadima would win the most Knesset seats in Tuesday’s general elections, both Kadima chair and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu claimed that they would be the country’s next prime minister.

Israel has a multiparty system; like many Western countries, one party seldom succeeds in winning a majority of the seats in Parliament. Instead, a coalition has to be formed after every election. This one will be no different.

Which is why both Likud and Kadima can claim their leader will be the country’s next prime minister; it all depends on the other parties. Who can work with who?

As it is, the leader of this year’s third largest party Israel Beiteinu, led by Avigdor Lieberman, will be kingmaker. If he decides to form an alliance with Likud, Netanyahu will be the next PM. If, however, Lieberman favors Kadima, or is unwilling to work with either party, Kadima’s Tzipi Livni will succeed Ehud Olmert.

The results of this election do matter; even though Kadima is more hawkish than the country’s Labor party, it is far less hawkish and more open to compromise than Likud.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Comrade Tovya
    February 11th, 2009 at 21:14
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Lieberman will form a government with the Likud. It’ll be announced within the next few days. Shas was the only thing holding back the coalition, and now Shas has agreed in principal.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.