Suicide Bombers Attack Kabul

February 11th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Taliban continue to attack Afghanistan government forces. At least five men armed with assault rifles and grenades attacked the Justice Ministry in the center of Kabul, a ministry employee told the Associated Press earlier today. Several people were killed.

U.S. officials, Afghan officials and Pakistani officials thought about talking to the Taliban in order to convince the extremist group to respect the authority of the central government. This goal could be accomplished, they hoped, by giving the group some kind of government responsibility, if not on a national than at least on a local level.

That seems to be off the table for now or, at least, one hears little to nothing about it these days. Instead, Americans especially focus on sending more troops to the wartorn country in order to fight, hopefully destroy, the Taliban.

Although the destruction of the Taliban would make the world a better place, it may very well be impossible to do so. The organization is deeply rooted in the country. The best approach is probably the one envisioned by Afghanistan and the U.S. late last year; involve them government, give them a degree of responsibility, and hope they’ll become more tolerant.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.