Pentagon: Gitmo Meets Standards of Geneva Convention

February 21st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Via Hot Air comes the news that the military review ordered by President Barack Obama found that Guantanamo Bay meets the standards of the Geneva Conventions. It’s important news in the debate about whether or not Gitmo should be closed and whether the prison camp was in breach with international law.

The military now says now. If the findings are accurate, the report will make it more difficult for Obama to close the hotly debated prison camp if no alternative way is found to deal with its prisoners.

It is good news, of course. We do have to wonder, though, whether it means that Obama should not close Gitmo at all. After all, whether it meets the standards of the Geneva Convention or not, it has done terrible damage to America’s image abroad.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Yandrosxx
    February 21st, 2009 at 18:50
    Reply | Quote | #1

    On the contrary, the main stream liberal media did much damage to America’s reputation. GITMO had nothing to with it. Good luck arguing it was all GWB now.

  2. meitene
    February 23rd, 2009 at 00:22
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Even assuming that the Pentagon report accurately assesses conditions at Gitmo at the present time, US credibility on the subject has been lost so thoroughly that it can no longer be restored by a governmental report of any kind. Trust in our government has been too badly damaged.

    Gitmo stands as the symbol for everything that went wrong in handling detainees, so the only way to restore trust on this subject if to turn the page by removing the symbol.

  3. ChrisWWW
    February 23rd, 2009 at 17:42
    Reply | Quote | #3

    “Everything’s fine in the hen house.” – Fox

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.