Janitor: The Job Everybody Wants

March 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

When I first saw this headline at Drudge, “Ohio school gets 700 applicants – for one janitorial job,” I intended to make fun of it until I counted till ten and thought to myself “wait, this is a job too. Why shouldn’t people want it? Why should we automatically make fun of people applying for a janitor’s job?”

Of course it’s a sign of the current crisis – normally, most of these people would apply for other jobs. But the 700 isn’t merely a sign of the dire situation many Americans find themselves in, it’s also a sign of their resiliance and of their determination to make the best of a difficult situation. They could also give up and wait for the government to bail them out. Instead, they go out and apply for a job most of us don’t want.

That’s personal responsibility in action.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay_C
    March 8th, 2009 at 03:42
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “That’s personal responsibility in action.”

    yup, it sure is, just one more example of how there are more people in this country that still beleive in personal responsability, rather than “community care”, “socialism”, (call it what you want).

  2. marc
    March 8th, 2009 at 08:29
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Right, if you had to mop floors to feed your children because it was the only job you could find, you’d do it. You wouldn’t be a man otherwise.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.