Palin says no to $515 million in ‘help’

March 20th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said yesterday that she won’t accept a significant part of the money allocated to Alaska in the economic ’stimulusplan’ of President Barack Obama and Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

She’ll accept some hundreds of millions dollars for measures she believes helpful to stimulate the state’s economy, but she said no to $515 million because she believes this money will be spent on plans Democrats have had for years, which do little to nothing to stimulate the economy yet increase the size of the federal government tremendously, and come with too many strings attached to them. Lastly, Palin argues that the federal government wants to kick off new major projects which Washington will only support for a few years, after those years Alaska will have to pay for these new projects itself.

Although Alaskans are generally very independent-minded and critical of the federal government, Palin is taking a tremendous risk nonetheless. She’ll be up for reelection next year; she can be darn sure that her opponent, whomever he will be, will criticize her refusal and use it to portray her as anti-education (part of the $515 million was meant for education), anti-the people, etc.

The above leads me to believe that Palin’s stance is due to her national rather than regional ambitions. If she wants to be her party’s candidate for president in 2012, she knows she’ll have to convince the base that she’s a real fiscal conservative who wants to make government smaller rather than bigger.

Also blogged at Dagelijkse Standaard.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Richard
    March 20th, 2009 at 17:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Perhaps she has read the bill, and, along with several other governors, realizes that after two years the offers become more “unfunded Federal mandates” that the state will not be able to afford.

  2. FraidyKatt
    March 20th, 2009 at 18:58
    Reply | Quote | #2

    That is the problem with this stimulus bill. There are all kinds of stuff in there that become permanent and force the Fiscal GOP to just say no and then when they do the other side makes hay with it as being against the little man. Wanting everyone to suffer and die.

    But the American people know stuff. They are learning how the politicians play this game and this stuff is now coming to light and we are understanding more and more how DC works.

    They lie, cheat and steal and deflect, spin and do more lying to accomplish only one thing. To make the other side look bad so that the American people will think they are good and the other side is evil.

    But we know stuff about that stuff. It just can’t be hidden anymore.

    Stuff. It does a body good.

  3. Michael van der Galien
    March 20th, 2009 at 20:11
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Perhaps she has read the bill, and, along with several other governors, realizes that after two years the offers become more “unfunded Federal mandates” that the state will not be able to afford.

    I pointed that out, I believe?
    See here:

    Lastly, Palin argues that the federal government wants to kick off new major projects which Washington will only support for a few years, after those years Alaska will have to pay for these new projects itself.

    FraidyKatt:

    That is the problem with this stimulus bill. There are all kinds of stuff in there that become permanent and force the Fiscal GOP to just say no and then when they do the other side makes hay with it as being against the little man. Wanting everyone to suffer and die.

    But the American people know stuff. They are learning how the politicians play this game and this stuff is now coming to light and we are understanding more and more how DC works.

    Which is, I believe, a good thing. It’s time Americans see through political games.

  4. Jay_C
    March 20th, 2009 at 20:28
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Good call on her part! I have heard this same argument on my local radio talk show about States taking this federal money that will fund liberal inititives for a few years and the sate is on their own to you, raise taxes yet again to pay for them. I am glad these sorts of games are finally coming to light. “The devil is in the details” as they say. If doling out money like this doesn’t involve simple principles, something is fishy.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.