Senate Democrats to scrap tax cuts

March 25th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , ,

no tax cutsGood news for Americans who thought Barack Obama would cut their taxes significantly once in office:

A top Democrat in the Senate announced a budget blueprint Tuesday that would scrap Barack Obama’s signature tax cut after 2010 and blends sleight of hand with modest restraint on domestic programs to cut the deficit to sustainable levels.Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., promises to reduce the deficit from a projected $1.7 trillion this year to a still-high $508 billion in 2014. But to do so, he assumes Congress will let Obama’s “Making Work Pay” tax credit delivering $400 tax cuts to most workers and $800 to couples will expire at the end of next year. Those tax cuts were included in Obama’s stimulus package.

Conrad, D-N.D., who has for decades sought to highlight the dangers of permanent deficits and rising government debt, produced a budget plan bristling with both—even after proposing to require wealthier taxpayers to pay higher rates income and capital gains.

In other words, Democrats approved massive government spending that does little to nothing to stimulate the economy, a gigantic increase of the size of the government, and then tell the American people the tax cuts will expire in 2010 because it would be ‘irresponsible’ to make them permanent considering the government gigantic new budget deficits.

Will Americans fall for it? I think not.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. FraidyKatt
    March 26th, 2009 at 01:16
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Lies. Lies and more dayum lies.

    Everyone always PROMISES they will cut the deficit in half and what always happens is it gets bigger and then they blame the other guy and we say uhhh okay duh………gee wuteveah.

    This is more of those lies. In 2014 the budget deficits will be 3 trillion a year. That is if we are not bankrupt by then.

    LIARS. They are lieing to us all. Period.

  2. Michael van der Galien
    March 26th, 2009 at 01:29
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Not just lying, but purposefully deceiving as well. Politics – it’s dirty, dirty politics.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.