Dutch Parliament debates economic crisis

March 26th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , ,

geert wildersThe Dutch Parliament is currently debating the financial crisis, and the government’s ’solution’ to it. The economic plan put forth by the Dutch government has lots in common with the one accepted by Democrats in the U.S.: future generations will have to work years if not decades in order to pay off the debt accumulated by those in power today.

Members of the government coalition are behaving incredibly arrogant. They told the opposition that their opinions did not matter, that they had agreed with each other on a ‘plan’ and that all other alternatives would not even be taken serious. Why have a debate then, many wondered?

Geert Wilders, leader of the PVV, responded as a master of political opportunism: his entire party stood up, he approached the mic and told the representatives of the government they’d leave because the debate was useless. The entire party walked out saying “we are fed up, the country is fed up.”

As said, a masterly move. Wilders may not be the most educated member of parliament, but he is an absolute political genius. He expresses the emotions and thoughts felt and held by many if not most Dutch. Of course walking out of a debate in Parliament can hardly be called democratic – we have a parliamentary system, even if you’re angry you have to debate and represent your voters – but Wilders’ move will undoubtedly increase his popularity, for most Dutch agree with his description of this country’s government and politics in general.

Mark Rutte, the man who leads the conservative liberal VVD, is perhaps the best informed MP. He is speaking as I wrote this piece, and doing a tremendous job exposing the government’s plan’s weaknesses. “Instead of solving this major crisis, you act like a clueless father who gives ‘the children’ [i.e. voters] a lollypop,” he told Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende.

Rutte’s problem, however, is that Wilders plays the political game better than he does. Wilders’ economic plans are even more horrible than those of the government, but because he walked out no one can say so. Rutte’s plans are sensible and would greatly improve this country’s economy in the short, middle and long run. But he fails to use the sentiment so prevalent in Dutch society today, that we’re just fed up with politics in general, which will cost Rutte’s party seats during future elections.

And that’s a pity, for Rutte is exactly the kind of politician this country needs now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.