PoliSnark: People’s Republic of Berzerkeley Edition

March 27th, 2009 By: PoliSnark | Tags:

Libertarian removed from ballot in New York Congressional race. Intense debate ensues on Paulist blogs as to whether the Illuminati or the Grey Aliens are behind the plot.

FireDogLake finally finds something too vulgar even for its tastes.

New York Times cuts wages. Editorial blaming Bush pending funding.

Joe the Plumber to campaign against Employee Free Choice Act. EFCA proponents celebrate their rescue.

Washington Examiner fears rise of “authoritarian” Americorps. Next up: An expose on the evil Girl Scouts conspiracy.

Howard Dean discovers civility.

We continue to be blessed with morons for enemies.

Pot heads just really, really love pot, man.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tully
    March 27th, 2009 at 17:04
    Reply | Quote | #1

    You’ve never had to work with Americorps, have you?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.