A Vision for Republicans: Making Washington Work

April 2nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

Rob Wasinger

Rob Wasinger used to work for Senator Brownback and, before that, Kansas. As Brownback staffer, Wasinger became so indispensable that he got promoted to chief of staff. In other words, he was the man people had the to convince Brownback would benefit from talking to them. If Wasinger said no, the answer to a (any) request was negative.

Wasinger is a father of nine and a real American conservative. He was born and raised in a conservative, traditional household, went to Harvard but came back more rather than less convinced of conservatism’s basic strength as a political theory.

He’s now candidate for congress. Instead of going on national television or writing his views on the future of the Republican Party for a major newspapers, Wasinger chose to contact conservative blog Red State and to use it as a launching path for his campaign.

Although most such articles and posts are incredibly boring to read, this specific one is actually quite interesting. Wasinger writes:

But do you know the most important thing I learned along the way? That knowledge, experience, and values are not enough. They are just the starting point. If you cannot maintain and defend what you know and believe, all of the knowledge, experience, and values in the world will become shifting sand in Washington, DC.

Our nation’s capital needs reform right now, precisely because too many of our elected officials have been unable to maintain and defend our values. I have seen first-hand how Washington works, and I have seen why it fails. The sands have shifted for many of the people in Washington, DC. It sometimes seems we have more convictions than conviction. Our country is paying the price for that.

We need conservative leaders who have values and conviction. But we also need vision.
I have a vision of how conservative values and policies will help our country, and especially aid rural and small town America. I believe in a set of policies aimed at breaking down the barriers to prosperity for rural America, unleashing the ingenuity and productivity of the American worker, and rejecting the old, failed policies of high taxes and burdensome regulation. We cannot prosper when the government demands more and more of our money to sustain Washington, DC.

We have two simple choices. We can choose prosperity for Washington, DC or we can choose prosperity for the rest of America. I will always choose Kansas and America.

That last paragraph especially is important: “We can choose prosperity for Washington, DC or we can choose prosperity for the rest of America.”

Americans believe Washington doesn’t work for them. Its inhabitants are not ‘elected officials’ as much as ‘career polticians.’ They do everything in their power to remain in office, regardless of whether this means they have to act against the ‘interest’ of the people at large and the of the people they represent or not. Congress isn’t a goal. It’s a means. A means to serve the interests, and freedom, of the American people.

Having said that, I doubt that the House of Representatives is the real problem. Rather, the Senate is the place where most important battles take place. It were Republican Senators who voted for Obama’s economic plans, even though these plans were not in the interest of the people. They only supported them because they enjoy calling themselves “moderate Republicans.”

The House certainly is important. But House Republicans are generally doing a good job. Senate Republicans are an entirely different affair altogether; perhaps some House Republicans could try to get themselves promoted into the Senate. That could accomplish something.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    April 2nd, 2009 at 00:25
    Reply | Quote | #1

    From Hays, 30 miles from Russell, home of Bob Dole. Though I’m a regular visitor to Red State its a bit further to the right than my tastes. Given that names Sam Brownbeck and Paul Weyrich in the same post I can see what faction of the party he’s speaking to

  2. c3
    April 2nd, 2009 at 00:27
    Reply | Quote | #2

    PS 9 kids!!! Will he have time to give his full attention to congress? (Yes, that was a facetious remark. Call it the “Palin effect”)

  3. Jake
    April 2nd, 2009 at 03:13
    Reply | Quote | #3

    c3 :
    PS 9 kids!!! Will he have time to give his full attention to congress? (Yes, that was a facetious remark. Call it the “Palin effect”)

    Considering he served as a chief-of-staff to a United States Senator, I think he can handle it. That is a huge job. Also, I read on his blog that his wife used to homeschool all 9 kids! Sounds like they have the whole parenting thing under control. His wife actually runs his blog. http://blog.robwasinger.com Cool!

    Also, if you go to Rob’s website, he seems very diverse in the issues. A lot of economic stuff on it, it isn’t heavy in social conservative red meat. He seems very well-rounded.

  4. Luuk
    April 2nd, 2009 at 09:05
    Reply | Quote | #4

    interesting fellow

    seems to be the kind of republican we need more of

    though, what are his stands on foreign policy?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.