
Iran lashed out at Barack Obama on Monday:
Iran criticized on Monday U.S. President Barack Obama for saying Tehran posed a threat with its nuclear program and urged Washington and other countries possessing atom weapons to dismantle their arsenals.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi made the comments a day after Obama, who is seeking to engage Iran diplomatically in a sharp policy shift from George W. Bush’s approach, set out his vision for ridding the world of such arms.
Delivering a speech in Prague given new urgency by North Korea’s rocket launch, Obama also said the United States would go ahead with plans to build a missile defense shield in Europe as long as Iran posed a threat with its nuclear activities.
Qashqavi noted that the Bush administration, which spearheaded a drive to isolate Iran over its disputed nuclear plans, had also described the Islamic state as a threat.
Where is the love?
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
If President Obama and the US Congress would stop grovelling and kow-towing to IAPAC and the Zionists and Likudniks of Israel, there would be no problem. Both the Russians and the UN weapons Inspection team have said that there is no evidence that the Iranians were attempting to build nuclear weapons. Our CIA also said it, but yet we still have Obama parroting the IAPAC line,”The sky is falling,oops, we meant to say the Iranians are coming. Luckily for the US and Iran, the Bush White House finally started listening to the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year and turned down the Israeli’s when they sent their heavy hitters, Ehud Barak, Gabi Ashkenazi, and Meir Dagan to ask for US support for a joint strike against Iran. Gabi Ashkenazi came again this year, but was not allowed to talk to any policy makers.
Actions speak louder than words and the Iranians are correct when they point out that there would be more trust if some of the embargo against Iran were lifted and also attempts to destabilize the Iranian government were stopped. In late 2007 the Bush White House notified the top level members of Congress that they were going to allocate $400 million to attempt to destabilize the Iranian government. Those members of Congress should have stated their opposition, but went along like a pack of lambs.
Do a little searching and you will find out why the US has re-done our currency. a hint: It’s blow-back from the Iranians for only one of our attmpts to destabilize their currency and government. Remember folks, if a Hill Billy in Arkansas can have this information, the Iranians can also read and they are very smart people.
“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.” ~George Washington, ~page 269 of The 5000 Year Leap.
“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests.” ~ George Washington
“Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.” ~ Thomas Jefferson