<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran criticizes Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/04/06/iran-criticizes-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/04/06/iran-criticizes-obama/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:19:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/04/06/iran-criticizes-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-89814</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=12298#comment-89814</guid>
		<description>“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.  Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.” ~George Washington, ~page 269 of The 5000 Year Leap.

 
“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests.&quot; ~ George Washington


&quot;Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.&quot; ~ Thomas Jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.  Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.” ~George Washington, ~page 269 of The 5000 Year Leap.</p>
<p>“The nation which indulges toward another habitual hatred or habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interests.&#8221; ~ George Washington</p>
<p>&#8220;Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.&#8221; ~ Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aarky Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/04/06/iran-criticizes-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-89654</link>
		<dc:creator>Aarky Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=12298#comment-89654</guid>
		<description>If President Obama and the US Congress would stop grovelling and kow-towing to IAPAC and the Zionists and Likudniks of Israel, there would be no problem. Both the Russians and the UN weapons Inspection team have said that there is no evidence that the Iranians were attempting to build nuclear weapons. Our CIA also said it, but yet we still have Obama parroting the IAPAC line,&quot;The sky is falling,oops, we meant to say the Iranians are coming. Luckily for the US and Iran, the Bush White House finally started listening to the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year and turned down the Israeli&#039;s when they sent their heavy hitters, Ehud Barak, Gabi Ashkenazi, and Meir Dagan to ask for US support for a joint strike against Iran. Gabi Ashkenazi came again this year, but was not allowed to talk to any policy makers.
   Actions speak louder than words and the Iranians are correct when they point out that there would be more trust if some of the embargo against Iran were lifted and also attempts to destabilize the Iranian government were stopped. In late 2007 the Bush White House notified the top level members of Congress that they were going to allocate $400 million to attempt to destabilize the Iranian government. Those members of Congress should have stated their opposition, but went along like a pack of lambs.
Do a little searching and you will find out why the US has re-done our currency. a hint: It&#039;s blow-back from the Iranians for only one of our attmpts to destabilize their currency and government. Remember folks, if a Hill Billy in Arkansas can have this information, the Iranians can also read and they are very smart people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If President Obama and the US Congress would stop grovelling and kow-towing to IAPAC and the Zionists and Likudniks of Israel, there would be no problem. Both the Russians and the UN weapons Inspection team have said that there is no evidence that the Iranians were attempting to build nuclear weapons. Our CIA also said it, but yet we still have Obama parroting the IAPAC line,&#8221;The sky is falling,oops, we meant to say the Iranians are coming. Luckily for the US and Iran, the Bush White House finally started listening to the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year and turned down the Israeli&#8217;s when they sent their heavy hitters, Ehud Barak, Gabi Ashkenazi, and Meir Dagan to ask for US support for a joint strike against Iran. Gabi Ashkenazi came again this year, but was not allowed to talk to any policy makers.<br />
   Actions speak louder than words and the Iranians are correct when they point out that there would be more trust if some of the embargo against Iran were lifted and also attempts to destabilize the Iranian government were stopped. In late 2007 the Bush White House notified the top level members of Congress that they were going to allocate $400 million to attempt to destabilize the Iranian government. Those members of Congress should have stated their opposition, but went along like a pack of lambs.<br />
Do a little searching and you will find out why the US has re-done our currency. a hint: It&#8217;s blow-back from the Iranians for only one of our attmpts to destabilize their currency and government. Remember folks, if a Hill Billy in Arkansas can have this information, the Iranians can also read and they are very smart people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
