Britain’s MEP Dan Hannan condemns stimulus, G-20, nationalized health care

April 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , ,

dan hannan MEP

Through the IUSB Vision Blog come these videos from Dan Hannan MEP criticizing nationalized health care, the G-20 and stimulus bills agreed upon by it.
YouTube Preview Image
YouTube Preview Image

Also be sure to read his blogpost warning Americans not to copy the British health care system.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Garland
    April 7th, 2009 at 19:37
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Not that many numbers in that blogpost. A bit thin on the details. I’m sorry, but I want logos with my pathos. Ezra Klein provides a better balance in his column. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-klein7-2009apr07,0,3092824.story

    As for the almost endless sums committed to stopping the current economic paroxysm, I still cannot really be approving or disapproving. The sceptic in me thinks it may be too much, but I don’t have anything to navigate by when it come to matters like that.

  2. Chuck Norton
    April 7th, 2009 at 21:00
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Hi Garland,

    While a longer and more detailed article may be better for sociophiles like you and me that just love to gobble this stuff up, it is important to keep in mind why BLOGS are so popular as a growing source of news for consumers. The good blogs like Poligazette can give you a short, pretty solid analysis on most stories in just a few minutes. Blogs also serve the purpose for those who are not as learned as you and I to get some “milk” on important issues when the consumer is not ready for “meat”.

    This is not to say that blogs don’t give deep and detailed substantive analysis when needed because I do and Michael certainly does when he feels it is necessary, but those posts tend to be read by people who live and breath that stuff and those posts are often skipped over by the consumers with just a short amount of time.

    In my experience the posts that get the most hits are the short, accurate news and analysis. We can always link them to more substantive work.

    One thing that I do as a blogger when I write a very large piece is that I will follow it up a day later with a shorter piece with accurate info but less detail.

    This brings us to Dan Hannan, who I must say is rather gifted at taking a highly complex issue and explaining it in a minute while still delivering a great deal of information. Dan Hannan does what the Republican Party in the United States needs to learn how to do.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.