Caliph Erdogan

April 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

erdogan

Erdogan continues to present himself as the next Caliph, or spiritual and political leader of ‘the Islamic world.’

This is exactly what’s wrong with Recep Tayyip Erdogan:

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan rejected attempts to call Turkey the representative of moderate Islam. “It is unacceptable for us to agree with such a definition. Turkey has never been a country to represent such a concept. Moreover, Islam cannot be classified as moderate or not,” Erdoğan said, speaking at Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies late Thursday.

Erdoğan’s statements came only days before the visit of U.S President Barack Obama whose administration signaled a dramatic shift from George W. Bush in identifying Turkey as a moderate Islamic country. U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had praised Turkey as “a democratic country with a secular constitution” during her visit to Ankara in March. In his speech, “Alliance of Civilizations and Turkey’s role,” Erdoğan pointed to the lack of dialogue between different religions and cultures, which has led to distressing incidents in the world history.

“The animosity, unfortunately, strengthens the scenarios that there is a so-called clash of civilizations in the world. Those, who defend such speculations, may go further to identify the terrorism with Islam which is based on peace,” he maintained, adding that the situation helps those who try to globalize Islamophobia.

Erdoğan also wanted Western societies to be more open to cooperation and dialogue with the East. “It should be known that adopting a malicious and offending approach toward the sensitive issues of Islamic world by hiding behind some democratic freedoms like freedom of speech and right of free publication is unacceptable,” he said.

Drawing attention to the importance of mutual understanding and respect, Erdoğan stated that he believes and respects Moses and Jesus, and accepts them as prophets. “I expect the same attitude from a Jew or a Christian toward my own prophet,” Erdoğan noted. He underlined the importance of Turkey’s European Union membership in terms of establishing connections between the West and the East.

Now, this post won’t be part of the debate about whether or not “moderate Islam” exists. No. Far more important from a political point of view is that Erdogan is starting to behave like a new Califph rather than the as the prime minister of the secular Republic of Turkey. He has no business talking about theological issues. It is his job to protect Turkey’s interests, not those of Islam.

It is truly unacceptable for Erdogan to give any speeches about what he thinks Islam represents, how he experiences his faith, etc. He is not an Imam, but a politician.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Cole
    April 10th, 2009 at 17:00
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Thank you that is exactly what I thought – why is he coming out for Islam – and the Islamic world – before everything else – and this is largely what those in the US who advocate Turkey membership in the EU – don’t get and what the EU do – and are paying attention to Erdogan’s religions antics – sometimes with utter dismay.

    Good call!

  2. Erdogan
    February 8th, 2010 at 18:50
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I'm from Turkey, this man is a traitor to Islam; why on earth would any Muslim want to join the EU? We must create our own union. Don't get me wrong, I do want economic relations with Europeans and Americans but Islamic values must come first. Westerners have their own values and union and NATO, so should us Muslims. Also to be able to defend ourselves against hostile nations (unfortunately mainly western).

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.