Michelle Obama for president?

April 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: ,

michelle obama for senate

CNN asked the public whether they believe First Lady Michelle Obama should run for president in 2020, just as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did last year. The results: 83% answered no. Only 17% believe she should. That is a low amount, of course, but you could argue that the results would have been similar if CNN asked this question in 1994 about Hillary.

Still, she came darn close to the nomination of the Democratic Party and almost automatically, therefore, to the presidency.

Be that as it may, a run for president by Michelle Obama can be considered highly unlikely.

What does sound like a possible scenario, however, is an attempt by the First Lady to become a member of the U.S. Senate. As Hot Air explains: “Here’s how you’ll know if she’s serious about running for office herself: The One will shock the world by endorsing Roland Burris for Senate next year, implicitly signaling some sort of agreement by which Burris will retire come 2016 so that Michelle can run for the seat. Barring that, the Obamas will have no options except appointing Durbin to a cabinet post in his second term, freeing his seat for a special election.”

“Hillary blazed the trail in this area and the media loves Michelle even more than they loved her. Why wouldn’t she run?”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Noga
    April 7th, 2009 at 14:16
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Do people really plan that far ahead? To me she seems like a person still in the stage of trying on new and pretty shoes, not all that comfortable and sometimes wishing for her well-worn sneakers. It doesn’t seem like M Obama is much interested in politics, per se, except for husband. She is a much more traditional first lady than Hillary Clinton ever was. Hillary’s ambition was palpable.

  2. ch
    April 7th, 2009 at 15:39
    Reply | Quote | #2

    This question was asked regarding Hillary Clinton (should she run for president) during her health care rollout in 1993 and over 40% responded “Yes”.

  3. Interested
    April 7th, 2009 at 22:41
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Noga – Hillary did.

    If she wanted to follow the Senate tract – she does not need Burris to get out she just needs to look for any state that leans Left or is left – and establish residency in line with State rules.

    Hillary in response – people knew back then that they didn’t want her elected to the big seat – it just took 14 years to see the realization.

  4. Shay
    April 8th, 2009 at 05:57
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Not gonna happen. Michelle Obama (who I’ve met here in Chicago on several occasions as my friends’ former boss, long before she got in the public eye) is not one to go into politics. Not her thing at all. Being a policy wonk at some think-tank, perhaps. Running for elected office, absolutely not. She didn’t even like her husband going into politics, but she knew what she signed up for when she married him and she didn’t want to hold him back.

  5. Daniel
    April 29th, 2009 at 04:31
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Please to confirm Michelle to Hillary is a joke. For starters Hillary has a very strong political back ground, she is a born leader and has the balls, Michelle is just your typical house wife

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.