China’s birth rate causing ‘oops’ moment

April 10th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

no women in china

You don’t say! Limiting people’s inherent right to have as freaking many babies as they want, creates problems in the long run?

China has 32 million more young men than young women—a gender gap that could lead to increasing crime—because parents facing strict birth limits abort female fetuses to have a son, a study released Friday said.The imbalance is expected to steadily worsen among people of childbearing age over the next two decades and could trigger a slew of social problems, including a possible spike in crime by young men unable to find female partners, said an author of the report published in the BMJ, formerly known as the British Medical Journal.

That’s shocking, isn’t it? Who would have thought that treating human beings like animals causes major social problems? I know I didn’t. I thought you could just mess around with society indefinitely. “Family is the cornerstone of society” is, as we all know, merely a slogal used by the radical right in order to implement a radical conservative agenda.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    April 10th, 2009 at 22:32
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Technically though it’s the combination of the government’s policy and the existing cultural preference for males that’s causing the problem. I don’t support the government mandates, of course, but it’s not exactly accurate to blame the whole problem on that when the Chinese culture is what causes the females to be aborted or abandoned.

  2. hitnrun
    April 19th, 2009 at 05:26
    Reply | Quote | #2

    @C Stanley: So it’s not fault of the social scientists treating a billion human beings like a Petri dish, it’s the darned people who insist on remaining members of their culture. Got it.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.