Pope: “We have drifted into a desert of godlessness”

April 11th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: ,

pope benedict

The Pope today:

“Jesus is humiliated in new ways even today – when things that are most  holy and profound in the faith are being trivialised, the sense of the sacred is  allowed to erode.

“Everything in public life risks being desacralised – persons, places,  pledges, prayers, practices, words, sacred writings, religious formulae,  symbols, ceremonies. Our life together is being increasingly  secularised.

“Religious life grows diffident. Thus we see the most momentous matters  placed among trifles, and trivialities glorified.

“Values and norms that held societies together and drew people to higher ideals are laughed at and thrown overboard. Jesus continues to be ridiculed.’

More:

“May we never question or mock serious things in life like a cynic.

“Allow us not to drift into the desert of godlessness. Enable us to  perceive you in the gentle breeze, see you in street corners, love you in the  unborn child…

“There are societies too that are thoughtless about their future. Christ must be weeping for their children.”

Don’t worry, he’ll be more positive Sunday. And about the exact content of his message, I think that many readers of this blog would agree with him. At least to some (significant) degree.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    April 11th, 2009 at 16:00
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Don’t worry, he’ll be more positive Sunday.

    Yes, we Catholics are very big on pausing in the darkness before we celebrate the light of Easter. The cnadles in our sanctuaries are unlit right now.

  2. marc
    April 11th, 2009 at 19:53
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I would agree with the sentiment; however, the word drifted implies that the movement is merely incidental, which is not the case.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.