Bloomberg to Run as Republican

April 12th, 2009 By: Michael Merritt | Tags: ,

By David ShankboneNew York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will run for re-election on the Republican ballot line, reports the New York Daily News.  Bloomberg left the party in 2007 to become an Independent and was rumored to be looking to run for President, and he was suggested as a Vice Presidential running mate, though neither ever came true.  In registration, Bloomberg will remain an Independent.

I wonder why Bloomberg even needs to go on a party line?  I’m not sure about New York City election laws, but it’s not like Bloomberg isn’t a big name.  He should be able to easy get his way on to the ballot, even if ballot laws are ridiculously cumbersome.  As for funding, Bloomberg’s claim to fame before politics was as a successful businessman.  He has millions to his name.

Perhaps the real reason is that he’d rather not have another major party challenger for the position.

By taking the Republican spot, his only other serious challenger is going to be a Democrat.  If that’s a serious challenger at all.  According to News Day, Bloomberg remains fairly popular, with the last poll I can find putting him at 64% approval.  That’s not extremely great, but it could be worse.  As for other Republicans who were going to run for the nomination, I think the party apparatus will be behind Bloomberg now that he has decided to run as one.  They want to win again, don’t they?

Whatever the reason, this Independent thinks Bloomberg should have stuck to his guns and run as an Independent.

(H/T Huffington Post)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.