Iraqi National Security Adviser: Iraq Moving West

April 12th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

iraq

Today on CNN’s State of the Union with John King, Mowaffak al-Rubaie, Iraqi National Security Adviser, spoke about progress in Iraq. Al-Rubaie explained what Iraq wants of the U.S. now:

Well, we are all much more intelligent with hindsight and I believe we have now very, very competent and very well trained and equipped, the Iraqi security forces. The Iraqi security forces are leading and doing most of the combat operation now. What we are requiring. Only the high-end very specialized counterterrorism operation and some logistical support, some air fire support, some navy support, that is what we are requiring. And we are building these as we go along and in the next year or so, we will be in a position to take all — to take over all of our country. All the security, all over the country.

It’s difficult if not impossible to imagine al-Rubaie saying the same thing two, or even one year ago. The success of the surge is truly unprecendented in modern history. Together with military leaders like General David Petraeus and top diplomats who understood Iraq’s culture, George W. Bush finally succeeded in stabilizing the war-torn country and bringing formerly warring parties together. General Ray Odierno also appeared at the show, saying he was 100% confident that all American troops will have left Iraq by 2011.

That’s interesting, but what’s even more interesting is the following remark by the Iraqi National Security Adviser:

I don’t want to elaborate on differences, but I believe that the President Obama understands the situation in Iraq and I believe he wanted to stick by the Status of Forces Agreement, the withdrawal agreement and what — his visit to Iraq, it’s a very significant visit. Because this is the first Arab country President Obama paid this visit to and it means a lot to us, because it means the United States government is adhering to the Strategic Framework Agreement and shows the commitment of the United States government towards Iraq and towards helping Iraq.

Iraq is definitely and irreversibly and decisively flying west and in return of the United States government is committing itself to helping Iraq and reconstruct — in the reconstruction and in ensuring its democratic system.

Although Bush and his top advisers have faced a lot of criticism in recent years – with many arguing that Iraq would never be a true, loyal and relatively ideological ally of the West where democracy rules – Al-Rubaie seems to strongly believe that they were right nonetheless. Bush and others have said for years that Iraq would eventually stabilize and that it would become a stable democracy, more focused on the West than on, say, Iran or Saudi Arabia, where two fundamentalist regimes rule.

We have to wait and see whether things will go as al-Rubaie hopes, but if it does, history may indeed vindicate Bush. At least to a significant degree.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.