Link Mess

April 14th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

link messHere is your daily link mess. Don’t know what ‘link mess’ is? Well, scroll down:

I’ll start today’s installment of “Link Mess” with words of praise for Jonah Goldberg. Jonah praised President Barack Obama’s handling of the pirate situation. He was immediately criticized by some – he says that most emails he received were positive – and decided to publish a follow-up post in which he explains quite well why he praised Obama, and why he will do so again whenever he believes the president makes the right call. “I am strongly pro-tax cuts, pro-free market, pro-federalism, anti-judicial activism, pro-school choice, pro-gun rights, and pro-shooting pirates who take Americans hostage or harass our ships. When Obama’s policy choices overlap with mine, I will congratulate him for it as much as I think warranted.” He adds that he disagrees strongly with those who say that conservatives should do to Obama and progressives in general what they did to Bush and the conservative movement in the last eight year. “I don’t do propaganda, I don’t want to do propaganda, and I don’t know why anyone in my line of work would want to do propaganda,” he writes. I agree completely. It is, therefore, shocking to read that he is being attacked by Rush Limbaugh today – or so he writes in his post.

Bad news for those who believe that San Francisco, France, Europe and New York City are hell on earth: Daily Kos says that a majority of Americans have a favorable opinion of all of them.

Harry’s Place takes a closer look at the interview with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, published by German newspaper Der Spiegel recently. The conclusion: “The political power of nuclear weapons is rooted in the fear which they generate, in the compromises they enforce upon others; you can use them without exploding them. An Iran emboldened by nuclear weapons means a Middle East in which antisemitism, homophobia and theocratic tyranny become even further entrenched.”

“We’re not getting Afghanistan right, and nothing in the latest plans suggest that we will get it right any time soon.  Are we even sure what it is we hope to accomplish or even why we’re trying to accomplish it?” wonders Lex at Scholars and Rogues. Read the entire article and bookmark S&D (which is run by Russ Wellen, a friend of mine).

AJ Strata believes that science proves that Al Gore and his fellow climate change-hysterics are wrong.”It is about to get scientifically really uncomfortable for Al Gore and the Church of IPCC. It seems that some serious analysis has discerned that, without the biased GISS data that has been proven wrong time and time again, there actually is no global warming.” For some reason, Strata seems to be unable to understand the following: this is not about science, it is about faith.

Chuck Todd will get his own political show on MSNBC, Ron Chusid writes. Great news, isn’t it? Another liberal pundit getting a show on MSNBC. That’s… incredibly surprising and refreshing. Heh.

Michelle Obama has succeeded in ruining Easter for children everywhere. How? By making “Diet and Excercise” the theme of the First Lady’s first White House Easter Egg Roll. As I understand it, she plans to make “Go to Bed Early, Eat Vegetables” the theme of her first Christmas party later this year.

The Swamp reports that most Americans believe that President Obama has not made the U.S. more likely to be attacked by terrorists. Dick Cheney disagrees. Joe Biden does not. It was to be expected from the former, of course, but the latter may disagree. After all, isn’t he the man who promised voters that America would face a “major international crisis” during Obama first couple of months in power?

Ever wondered what all those tea parties are about exactly? Scott Johnson has the answer. It seems to me that it is a mixture of voters being fed up where America is now, and scared of where it might be several years from now. Donald Douglas also wrote an interesting post about the phenomenon. Read the whole thing.

Lastly, Jesse Jackson Jr. is in trouble: he reportedly told former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich that he would raise $5 million for the governor if appointed to Barack Obama’s Senate seat. Come on! That’s not “pay-to-play” – it’s “pay-to-say-thank-you.” Also blogged at Protein Wisdom.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.