The Idea-less Party

April 14th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

eric cantor again

That’s the image the GOP is struggling to overcome. Politico:

House Republican Whip Eric Cantor — the man Democrats dubbed “Dr. No” — is taking great pains these days to prove he has a raft of ideas of his own.

Stung by the Democratic barbs, the House’s No. 2 Republican is unveiling a “Solutions Center” on the Web to address simple questions Americans are asking themselves in the face of economic calamity: “How will I keep my job?” … “How will I keep my house?” … “How will I grow my savings?”

The goal is to answer the questions with Republican proposals that contrast starkly with legislation offered by President Barack Obama and his congressional allies.

Cantor told Politico that Republicans “need to work to make sure the message gets out.” The message may not “yet have been delivered,” but he and his fellow House Republicans will “continue to work at that.”

David Winston, a GOP pollster who monitors the environment for House Republicans explains: “What this Republican leadership is trying to do is define what the choice is. If Republicans are defining what their policies are, they will fare better than if they go up against Obama as a personality test.”

Although some have immediately criticized the site (interestingly enough not its ideas as much as its design and apparent focus on the “haves” rather than the “have-nots” [memo to Jill: there are more haves than have-nots]), I have to say it looks reasonable (its content). Considering the site launched today, that is.

The layout is fairly simple: four questions most Americans worry about are asked (“how will I keep my job?”; “how should we use taxpayer money?”; “how will I grow my savings?”; “how will I keep my house?). When you click on the – yes, quite ugly even cartoonish (change the frigging design immediately – it doesn’t even almost look professional) – icon, you’re taken to a different page where the economic plan of House Republicans on this specific subject is summarized. If you want to read more, you can click on the “read more” button which takes you to a more extensive and detailed PDF file.

Again: Not bad. Not bad at all.

They will have to find some way, however, to get voters to visit the site. As of yet, the only people who visit it are bloggers like myself. They’ll have to get the word out. Cantor should go on TV, radio shows, Internet talk shows, talk to bloggers and print media journalists, etc. The GOP has ideas. It has just not succeeded in sharing them with the public at large.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.