National Republicans Support Arlen Specter

April 15th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , ,

specter

Senator Arlen Specter is in trouble at home in Pennsylvania. A conservative, former Congressman Pat Toomey, has said he wants to challenge him for the nomination of his party, the GOP. Normally, sitting senators are only challenged by ambitious individuals from the other party. Not so with Specter. He has received a lot of criticism due to his support for President Obama’s ridiculously expensive yet useless economic ’stimulus’ plan. Conservative bloggers and activists singled Specter out, saying they would force him to behave like a conservative rather than a ‘RINO’ (Republican In Name Only).

Sadly for these conservatives, however, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn disagrees. He wrote a letter yesterday in which he announces his support for Specter arguing that incumbents have a better shot at winning elections than a challenger. Additionally, Cornyn writes, a real conservative has a hard time winning a state-wide election in Pennsylvania. Only a moderate Republican can beat a Democratic challenger, especially if the Democrat is fiscally quite conservative.

Hot Air’s AP understands Cornyn’s reasoning, although he is not charmed by Specter himself. Especially not after word came out that the senator called on  (Republican and Independent) Pennsylvanians who reregistered as Democrats last year in order to vote in the Democratic primary race, to reregister again, this time as Republicans. If necessary, “for a day.”

In other words, Specter realizes he is in serious trouble. Instead of taking Toomey on by convincing Republican voters to throw their weight behind him, he is now “begging Democrats to cross over and vote for him.”If he were confident, he would not do so.

Where do, as a moderate conservative, stand in all of this, you may wonder? Well, I’m torn. On the one hand, I’m in favor of a big tent party. The GOP cannot win elections by alienating moderates. On the other hand, Specter did make a tremendous mistake by siding with Democrats over the budget. He should have supported his own party; the economic plans put forth by Democrats are not merely bad, they are disastrous. Additionally, I believe that Republicans can only start winning elections again if they govern as pragmatic fiscal conservatives. Specter is seemingly no fiscal conservative.

But writing him off completely? No, I don’t think that is useful either. Especially not because Pennsylvania is no Texas. Republicans have to be smart. So here is what conservatives should do: let Toomey take on Specter. Make sure he puts the pressure on the Senator, and makes it extremely difficult for him to win reelection. But let him win it nonetheless – but not by much. Specter will undoubtedly interpret this as a warning – and it is. If he does not change his voting record, if he continues to support fiscally liberal plans, his political career will come to an end – and he will become an outcast, a political pariah.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.