Why smart Republicans distance themselves from Glenn Beck

April 15th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

glenn beck and rush limbaugh

David Frum has been criticized a lot lately due to his somewhat strange habit to go after fellow conservatives. The criticism was well-deserved.

Today, he deserves to be praised, however:

Republican leaders should have put a hundred miles between themselves and Glenn Beck the first day he began dwelling lovingly on the possibility of right-wing armed violence in the United States. It’s a little awkward to do so now: that would look like falling in step with the Obama administration’s contrivances. But party leaders should quietly urge anyone with an (R.) after his or her name to keep as far away as possible from this unwitting tool of Obama administration spin.

Now, I have defended Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh in the past – and I will likely do so again in the (near) future – but you should not interpret my defense of them as an ‘endorsement.’ It is not. In fact, I do not enjoy listening to or watching them. Glenn Beck especially strikes me as a crazy clown.

However, these pundits play an important role in the conservative movement, and rightly so. They are not politicians. They do not have to be politically correct, nor do they have to be moderate and reasonable, let alone come up with practical solutions for America’s problems. No, they are right-wing entertainers who do a great job attacking Democrats generally and President Obama specifically. Millions of conservative voters listen to them daily and are influenced by them. When election time arrives next year again, these listeners will be the GOP’s most passionate activists and volunteers.

The above does not mean that politicians should suck up to Beck and Limbaugh. They should not attack them, but they should not become too close with them either. The two men are entertainers who regularly cross the line. Politicians should not. Politicians should be practical. Limbaugh and Beck have to play their role, lawmakers should focus on doing theirs.

B&L are not interested as much in the fate of the Republican Party as they are in their own success. And that is logical. They are entertainers and businessmen who work for successful businesses. Responsible Republican lawmakers should keep this in mind and act accordingly: do not attack conservative pundits publicly, but do not treat them as friends either. Instead, just ignore them and know that they are preparing conservative citizens for the next elections.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Erzuah
    April 16th, 2009 at 02:36
    Reply | Quote | #1

    You call these morons entertainers? They are confused clowns who cannot distinguish between rationality and insanity. The Rush/Beck/Hannity hate feeding machine will self-destruct and they will be the first victims of it. Remember the french men who invented and used the guilotine machine as if there was no tomorrow. What happened to them? These right-wing, hate-mongering talibanic loons detest the president not because of his policies. Its something more deeper and sinister than what they are falsely projecting to the public. They honestly wish he fails,and do not care even if his failure spells the doom of this beautiful country. They hate him not because of his policies but because of his personality. However, their inner desires will fall flat, and the hate they habor in their hearts will only turn into sickness that will consume and liquidate them into oblivion. God detest ugliness, and the hearts of these talibanic right wingers are damn ugly.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.