75% of Texans would vote to stay in USA

April 17th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , ,

texas

Thank you Rasmussen:

Thirty-one percent (31%) of Texas voters say that their state has the right to secede from the United States and form an independent country.

However, the latest Rasmussen Reports poll in the state finds that if the matter was put to a vote, it wouldn’t even be close. Three-fourths (75%) of Lone Star State voters would opt to remain in the United States. Only 18% would vote to secede, and seven percent (7%) are not sure what they’d choose.

Now, Texas is – generally (not talking about certain liberal cities) – a conservative, very conservative even, state. These conservatives show that conservatives aren’t crazed wackos willing to secede from the union if things do not go their way for a while. They are rational, reasonable adults who want to change things for the better by using the democratic process.

Why did I thank Rasmussen, you may wonder? Simple, because the governor’s reference to secession made the state – and therefore the South, tea party protesters, and conservatives in general – look extremely bad: Perry does not support secession, but bringing the possibility up gives opponents all the ammunition they need to portray ‘the conservative movement’ as a collection of reactionary fanatics. You can protect your state’s interests without referring to the ’s-word.’ And if you can’t, you’re not a good politician.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Doomed
    April 18th, 2009 at 04:03
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Do not think Rick Perry wants to leave the union and I do not think that anyone is really serious about leaving the union. It is talk. It is people reaching out to those that will listen and saying…….”enough…Listen to me….Please.”

    The problem is that whenever Ive heard this and mentioned it, the left responds with “I hope all you hillbilly rednecks leave with em.”

  2. Interested
    April 18th, 2009 at 05:44
    Reply | Quote | #2

    actually I don’t think seceding is even necessary. Texas is a part of the United States via Treaty.

    The people of Texas having, at the time of adopting their constitution, expressed by an almost unanimous vote, their desire to be incorporated into the Union of the United States, and being still desirous of the same with equal unanimity, in order to provide more effectually for their security and prosperity; and the United States, actuated solely by the desire to add to their own security and prosperity, and to meet the wishes of the Government and people of Texas, have determined to accomplish, by treaty, objects so important to their mutual and permanent welfare:

    HA, gotta love the Texans

    And, by a 63% to 24% margin, Texans view the federal government itself as a special interest group.

  3. Tully
    April 18th, 2009 at 19:16
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Perry does not support secession, but bringing the possibility up gives opponents all the ammunition they need to portray ‘the conservative movement’ as a collection of reactionary fanatics.

    News flash: DHS has already made portraying ‘the conservative movement’ as a collection of reactionary fanatics the official policy of the US Government.

    HopeChange!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.