General Motors to Cut 1,600 Jobs

April 21st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

general motorsGeneral Motors asked the federal government to bail it out once again a couple of months ago. Thus far, the Obama administration has made clear that it will only help if GM promises to implement the necessary reforms to survive for years, rather than months. Although the big company seemed willing to play ball, unions and other interest groups prevent it from doing what is necessary.

Still, today brings good news for those of us who believe that GM should not be bailed out (at least not unless it takes responsibility for its own problems and does something about them):

General Motors Corp is cutting about 1,600 salaried jobs in the United States this week as it rushes to meet a June 1 deadline to restructure under U.S. government oversight, the automaker said on Monday.

The reductions are part of GM’s plan to slash its global salaried work force by about 10,000, or 14 percent, in a bid to cut costs. GM also aims to cut 37,000 hourly jobs worldwide by the end of the year.

If true, it is a good sign. GM has to cut thousands of jobs. There is no other option.

Additionally, its workers (and executives for that matter) will have to agree to a lower salary than they currently enjoy (I will not say “earn,” for you do not “earn” a high salary if you do not help your company make a profit) and General Motors will have to become a modern company. There is a reason it cannot compete against Asian automakers, several even. If it survives, it has to be because it is competitive, not because the federal government pumped many billions into GM in order to save it from itself.

Having said all that, even if GM would push through the necessary changes, it would not make it even slightly acceptable for the U.S. government to bail it out. Many people work for GM, true. But if the government is going to rescue every single business that employs a lot of people, there will be no end to the bailouts. Not now, not next year, not after that.

No, what matters is whether the entire economy will collapse if GM goes bankrupt. The correct answer is it will not. The U.S. economy can deal with the loss of GM, especially if its healthy parts are revived.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.