TNR: A Sincere Warning to Big-Government Republicans

April 22nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

dollarsThe Next Right issued “a sincere warning to big-government Republicans” today. The site’s Stephen Gordon writes:

Shortly after I wrote this quick piece for the Alabama Republican Liberty Caucus website, I was called by someone in another state who tracked down my cell number from a press release.

I had posted the now-going-viral video below of South Carolina Congressman Gresham Barrett (R) being booed, told to go home, and having people turn their backs on him when he spoke at the Greenville, SC Tea Party.

Calling out a Republican from my state congressional delegation for a bad vote on an amendment to the budget bill was my initial intention, but it’s starting to turn into more than this now.

My caller liked the idea so much, he’s beginning to quietly organize his folks to show at a scheduled event for one of his local “RINOs in DC.” They plan to boo, turn their backs, and video the entire encounter. They also plan to quietly alert the media in advance…

To wrap this all up, it’s better that I don’t identify any states or congressional districts already targeted. This way, every last Republican with a bad fiscal conscience (or desire to be re-elected) who currently holds public office should be having nightmares about who might show at his or her next campaign rally or public speaking event. A healthy dose of paranoia can sometimes be a good thing.

Well, that is bad news for big-government Republicans, of course, but is it also bad news for the party as a whole?

Now, my take will undoubtedly surprise regular readers who know I often come to the defense of moderate conservative Republicans – I agree more often than I disagree with them: I think this is a good development.

Why do I think this is not necessarily a bad development? Because moderation does not automatically mean you have to favor big government – especially not wasteful spending. And let’s face it, there has been a lot of that for years, decades even.

I believe that the GOP can only stage a massive comeback if it convinces voters that it is a fiscally responsible party. Fiscal responsibility is not necessarily the same as fiscal conservative, but the two are twins. The Republican Party has to do better than it has done thus far- it has to favor policies that work, that are in the interest of today’s and of tomorrow’s voters. Massive debts and spending sprees may be nice for those living today, but they are horrific for future generations.

And let’s not even talk about pork, lobbyist groups being served day in, day out, and so on. Senator John McCain is quite a good example of a moderate yet fiscally reponsible Republican. Those who are not – those who use tax payer’s money to reward supporters, organizations and businesses – should be held responsible and kicked to the curve; if the GOP wants to show it is a valid alternative to the Democratic Party, that is.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.