Swine Flu Goes Global

April 27th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

swine fluThe swine flu has gone global. Britain is currently investigating seven suspicious cases. Earlier, media health officials said that one man in Spain and two in Scotland have come down with the flu following trips to Mexico.

The news comes at a time when European governments warned citizens against traveling to the U.S. and Mexico.

Meanwhile, ‘Russia, Hong Kong and Taiwan said they would quarantine visitors showing symptoms of the virus amid a surging global concern about a possible pandemic.’

At this moment, 149 people were killed by the virus in Mexico. 40 cases were confirmed in the United States thus far, six in Canada.

“Today we’ve seen increased number of confirmed cases in several countries,” WHO spokesman Paul Garwood told The Associated Press. “WHO is very concerned about the number of cases that are appearing, and the fact that more and more cases are appearing in different countries.”

President Obama said that although the reports are cause for “concern,” they are not cause “for alarm.”

Despite Obama’s calming words, citizens and governments worldwide worry.

The U.S. Defense Department joined the fun by saying it is monitoring the situation but not yet willing to release anti-viral drugs from its stockpiles.

Although there is certainly cause for concern, I agree with Obama that we should not panic. Global viruses come and go. It is part of life. It is also important to note that the only deadly victims thus far have occurred in Mexico. Every government is on stand-by. When suspicious cases are reported, medical doctors rush to the scene to help the patient and to limit the fall-out (read: spread). It is a serious problem, but let us not pretend that “it’s going to kill us all!”

Meanwhile, Matt Drudge deserves a lot of appreciation from everybody. He paid attention to this at the moment the first cases were reported in Mexico and he constantly kept an eye on its travel across the North American continent. Without his linking, most would not have been aware of the threat, and governments may have ignored it for a few days more, possibly leading to many more infections.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Garland
    April 27th, 2009 at 22:22
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Yeah, kudos to Drudge.

    It seems this latest calumny (because the universe decided we didn’t have enough to deal with) has a mortality of 6 % in Mexico. The Spanish Flu clocked in at, eh, 2.5 %, and has been hitting the young quite harshly. Hurm.

    The blogs are the place to go to, quite plainly. Listen to the media for too long and you’d think people were having dreams about mother Abigail and Randall Flagg. Still, if there is something that could really clean our clock, it’s this sort of thing. China must be on total lockdown by now.

  2. Rosa
    April 27th, 2009 at 23:12
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I agree blogs and online news seem to be more measured in their coverage of the issue.No need to panic, just wash your hands extra well, seems to be the overall, message. There is a really informative story about this on Newsy.com I highly suggest you check it out, here is the link: http://www.newsy.com/videos/the_world_on_swine_flu_alert/

  3. Interested
    April 28th, 2009 at 03:18
    Reply | Quote | #3

    good news is, our Spender-in-chief is one who’s frugal with the pocketbook.

    the US can easily absorb this if it outbreaks and kills a huge percentage of the population.

  4. Swine Flu
    April 28th, 2009 at 13:54
    Reply | Quote | #4

    The virus will go global, that seems quite clear. But then, pigs can’t fly. So the main path of infection will remain among humans. And with the growing awareness my guess is, the problem might resolve quicker than the previous bird flu.

  5. Interested
    April 29th, 2009 at 04:22
    Reply | Quote | #5

    ahhh, it’s good we have prudent leadership of the left

    “In my opening statement, I kept referring to it as the ’so-called’ swine flu,” he informed Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health. Harkin, who represents Iowa’s large pork industry, suggested that the flu “doesn’t necessarily come from pigs” and said that “a more correct terminology for this might be a ‘North American virus.’”

    When Fauci resisted that suggestion, Harkin tried another. “Why wouldn’t it be called an avian virus?” he said. Finally, Harkin moved on to a question of more importance: “How soon can we get a vaccine?”

    “That’s a very good point, instead of worrying about names,” Fauci answered.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.