Biden Does Best to Scare Americans

May 1st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , ,

Vice President Joe Biden continues to make gaffe after gaffe. Appearing on the Democrats’ party network – MSNBC – yesterday, he told Americans not to enter into any “confined” places like classrooms, the subway, and planes.

No kidding.

Let us imagine that the swine flu is indeed dangerous (read: deadly). Is it useful to tell people to shut down the entire country? To stop living? To avoid the subway? What would happen to, say, New York and its economy if people would refuse to travel in ‘confined places’? The entire economy would come to a standstill – and that while the world already suffers from a major recession.

Conclusion: if the swine flu posed a tremendous threat to us all, Biden should have worded his warning more carefully.

But the fact of the matter is that this specific flu is not as dangerous as many initially feared. In fact, this specific flu is not more dangerous than the normal flu.

Meanwhile, we should all thank Jake Tapper for asking Press Secretary Gibbs the tough questions. Watch the video of Tapper asking Gibbs about Biden’s remarks and the secretary’s answer.
YouTube Preview Image

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.