Obama set for ‘intense’ Pakistan, Afghan summit

May 3rd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , ,

pakistan recently launched an offensive against the Taliban in the Buner regionAFP reports:

US President Barack Obama meets Wednesday with the leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan, hoping to shore up the fight against Islamic extremism as concerns about the region mount.

The summit visibly showcases the new strategy of Obama, who says the United States must consider the neighboring countries together — rather than focus just on fighting Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants in Afghanistan.

The meeting comes as challenges deepen for both Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, whose popularity and authority have been crumbling, and Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who is up against a growing Taliban-led insurgency.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the administration would have “some very intense sessions” with the Afghan and Pakistani delegations on the new US strategy in the region.

It is difficult not to interpret this as a ‘last chance’ for the civilian government in Islamabad.

Kabul’s cooperation is, of course, incredibly important. But the real superpower in the region is Pakistan. Pakistan has supported Al Qaeda and the Taliban in the past. Without Islamabad’s aid, the Taliban would not have succeeded in taking over after the Soviets were kicked out in the 1980s, and they would not have been able to hold on to power for more than a decade afterwards either.

If you truly want to defeat the Taliban, Islamabad has to be with you all the way.

And that is precisely the problem. Asif Ali Zardari has been unable or unwilling (or both) to truly destroy the extremist organization. The group has even increased its presence in Pakistan’s tribal region. Instead of kicking them out of the country, Zardari agreed to make Sharia the official law of the regions controlled by the Taliban. This emboldened the group even more, which eventually resulted in a military offensive.

Last week, Pakistan finally felt forced to act and push the Taliban back into the Swat Valley. That is nice, but not even remotely enough. Islamabad says it still supports its Sharia-agreement with the group. This is highly problematic: in effect, the Taliban have created another safe haven from which they can operate and attack targets in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Obama has to convince Pakistan to declare all out war on the Taliban. If he fails, Afghanistan will remain unstable for years to come.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.