Britain Publishes List of People Not Allowed To Enter: Michael Savage On It

May 5th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

michael savageAfter the British government told Dutch MP Geert Wilders he was not allowed to enter the country because he would be too devisive a figure, Jacqui Smith said she would compile a complete list with “unwanted persons” to show that Britain wasn’t giving into demands from extremists.

Today, the list was published. It contains 16 of the most brutal, intolerant and dangerous people in the world.

Like talk radio show host Michael Savage.

No joke.

“I think it’s important that people understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it’s a privilege to come and the sort of things that mean you won’t be welcome in this country,” Ms Smith told GMTV.

“Coming to this country is a privilege. If you can’t live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you from this country and, what’s more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded…

“This is someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country,” Ms Smith told BBC Breakfast.

Fantastic. Labor once again shows its true colors. Its goal is not to protect the British people again violence, it is to protect them against “unwanted ideas.”

Unwanted ideas, of course, are ideas Labor disagrees with.

You have to wonder how long it takes before former President George W. Bush will be declared “least wanted person #17.”

Now don’t get me wrong. Savage is an impolite, rude, obnoxious, intolerant man who discriminates against people for their faith and who purposefully tries to insult them. I do not feel any need to defend him personally. In fact, I have little appreciation for what he does.

But that is not what this is about. This is about the freedom of speech, and people’s freedom to listen to whom they please. Savage may not be the most friendly person in the world, but being unfriendly is not a crime.

It surely has become clear in recent years why “1984″ was written by a Brit, no?

h/t.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    May 6th, 2009 at 02:00
    Reply | Quote | #2

    From what I’ve read about her, nothing new for Jacqui Smith. A true authoritarian she seems to be.

  2. Jay_C
    May 8th, 2009 at 02:53
    Reply | Quote | #3

    “Coming to this country is a privilege. If you can’t live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you from this country and, what’s more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded…”

    Imagine this, or something like this coming from the lips of any of our recent Presidents, and make it about illegals entering the US :)
    My point being, that as long as the liberal groupthink thought police think it is ok to hold these “you may not pass” beliefs, then they feel this is fine. But Those same liberals (and liberal media) would cry foul the minute these same words are applied to upholding standing immigrations laws here in the US.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.