Murtha’s Nephew Made Rich by No-Bid Contracts

May 5th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , ,

john murthaThe King of Pork is in the news again:

The headquarters of Murtech, in a low-slung, bland building in a Glen Burnie business park, has its blinds drawn tight and few signs of life. On several days of visits, a handful of cars sit in the parking lot, and no trucks arrive at the 10 loading bays at the back of the building.

Yet last year, Murtech received $4 million in Pentagon work, all of it without competition, for a variety of warehousing and engineering services. With its long corridor of sparsely occupied offices and an unmanned reception area, Murtech’s most striking feature is its owner — Robert C. Murtha Jr., 49. He is the nephew of Rep. John P. Murtha, the Pennsylvania Democrat who has significant sway over the Defense Department’s spending as chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.

Robert Murtha says he owes the contracts to his high quality work. His uncle has “nothing” to do with it.

Right.

And I’m Santa Claus.

Over the years, John Murtha has proudly claimed credit for using his Appropriations Committee seat to steer hundreds of millions in Pentagon work to companies in his district, many of them fledgling enterprises run by campaign contributors. His influence also may be seen in the military improvements at the Johnstown airport that bears his name. The little-used commuter airport doubles as a wartime preparedness facility for the Pentagon after $30 million in improvements.

Murtha’s power has had beneficial effects within his family. His brother, Robert C. “Kit” Murtha, built a longtime lobbying practice around clients seeking defense funds through the Appropriations Committee and became one of the top members of KSA, a lobbying firm whose contractor clients often received multimillion-dollar earmarks directed through the committee chairman.

Robert C. Murtha Jr. of Murtech is Kit Murtha’s son. He also is a former Marine who once served as a presidential security officer and aide to the president for White House functions. He worked for eight years for ACS, a defense and information technology contractor. When Lockheed purchased ACS in 2004, he started several companies, including Murtech, which he registered as a defense contracting firm.

I am with Ed Morrissey: “Granting no-bid Pentagon contracts to a powerful Congressman’s nephew screams for an investigation, and a deeper look at the “culture of corruption” that seems to surround John Murtha and his allies on Capitol Hill.”

Murtha is an unbelievable person. The fact that he wins reelection time and again says all we need to know about the weaknesses of the American political system. This man should have been kicked out of office years ago. Instead, he stole tax payer’s money to give it to Pennsylvanians and, perhaps, to his relatives.

Such a man should not be in a position of power.

Unless you enjoy paying for the Murthas expenses, that is.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Doomed
    May 6th, 2009 at 00:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Well you have to love how the Democrats are providing us with Moral leadership. As they screamed about the no bid contracts that they all slipped to their friends and relatives while condemning Bush and Cheney as LIARS.

    I rather suspect it was Murtha’s payment for being the front man of the Democratic party for the Antiwar.

  2. Michael Merritt
    May 6th, 2009 at 02:11
    Reply | Quote | #2

    My former Republican Governor went to jail for things like this. Murtha better watch out.

  3. Interested
    May 6th, 2009 at 07:50
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Now why aren’t Garland and other lefties here screaming the injustice over this and demanding full inquiries into it.

    They certainly do when the tables are reversed.

  4. Interested
    May 8th, 2009 at 02:11
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Garland? nothing? no outcry?

  5. Bud Somerville
    February 9th, 2010 at 15:53
    Reply | Quote | #5

    I know Bob Murtha he is a great guy and when we build stuff for him it is top of the line,we would not and never would take anything away from our front line troops,that is what they are fo I dont care no bid whatever I know nothing about that I do know that when we make these things our military is right there with us,my son is a Marine,many kids I coached are serving in all branches I make this for them so they are safe

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.