<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama makes a joke: proposes useless cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay_C</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93513</guid>
		<description>Interesting how Obama laughed off McCain&#039;s Idea on the campaign trail to cut 18 billion in earmarks saying it was only 1/2 of 1% of the budget.

And what exactly are these cuts?  Probably like cutting the budget of police force, and benifts paid to slain police officers? or sending our soldiers to fight their war without the proper equiptment?  He pulled the old &quot;See we made cuts&quot; move and as a result, it sill hurt people, then when we complain about what was cut, he will say, see we made cuts like you wanted, now will you believe we can&#039;t make cuts? (Rather than cutting money for business and personal welfare, for those that don&#039;t need it, or should fail)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how Obama laughed off McCain&#8217;s Idea on the campaign trail to cut 18 billion in earmarks saying it was only 1/2 of 1% of the budget.</p>
<p>And what exactly are these cuts?  Probably like cutting the budget of police force, and benifts paid to slain police officers? or sending our soldiers to fight their war without the proper equiptment?  He pulled the old &#8220;See we made cuts&#8221; move and as a result, it sill hurt people, then when we complain about what was cut, he will say, see we made cuts like you wanted, now will you believe we can&#8217;t make cuts? (Rather than cutting money for business and personal welfare, for those that don&#8217;t need it, or should fail)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomed</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93448</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93448</guid>
		<description>The budget seeks $533.8 billion for the Defense Department, excluding war costs,

The key here is that the Democrats just gave Obama 90 Billion for the war with the ultimatium that &quot;ONE YEAR&quot; Mr. President.  Doing two things....lying to their far left antiwar base and giving Obama one more year to get his far left agenda in place while convincing the nation that we will be out of the wars in one year.

Hogwash.  I said during the primaries to any who would listen that come 2012 no matter who is elected we will still be in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Why?  Because in the end Politicians lie about everything.  If their lips are moving.  They are lying.  No way democrats could stand up and say....okay well now that we are in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to make it work out. 

Afghanistan was controlled by Pakistan and Iraq was a secular nation that opposed Iran and gave her a mortal enemy.  Iran could not afford a nuclear program and still keep up an army that opposed Iraq.  Now that we have taken her only enemy away Iran is able to spend billions on Nuclear.

So leaving Iraq will destablilze the middle east.  Not fighting the taliban with a fervor will most likely put Nukes in the Taliban&#039;s hands.  Thats a good plan.  They will just ship them over to Americas ports in ships and detonate them in Houston, San Fransciso, New York, Washington...etc...etc.  and America will be bankrupt.

Good plan Democrats.  Lets be sure to play to your base on Afghanistan and cross our fingers that Obama can work out a deal with the nuclear armed Taliban.  Perhaps he could offer then Sharia law in all those red states that didnt vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The budget seeks $533.8 billion for the Defense Department, excluding war costs,</p>
<p>The key here is that the Democrats just gave Obama 90 Billion for the war with the ultimatium that &#8220;ONE YEAR&#8221; Mr. President.  Doing two things&#8230;.lying to their far left antiwar base and giving Obama one more year to get his far left agenda in place while convincing the nation that we will be out of the wars in one year.</p>
<p>Hogwash.  I said during the primaries to any who would listen that come 2012 no matter who is elected we will still be in Iraq and Afghanistan?</p>
<p>Why?  Because in the end Politicians lie about everything.  If their lips are moving.  They are lying.  No way democrats could stand up and say&#8230;.okay well now that we are in Iraq and Afghanistan we have to make it work out. </p>
<p>Afghanistan was controlled by Pakistan and Iraq was a secular nation that opposed Iran and gave her a mortal enemy.  Iran could not afford a nuclear program and still keep up an army that opposed Iraq.  Now that we have taken her only enemy away Iran is able to spend billions on Nuclear.</p>
<p>So leaving Iraq will destablilze the middle east.  Not fighting the taliban with a fervor will most likely put Nukes in the Taliban&#8217;s hands.  Thats a good plan.  They will just ship them over to Americas ports in ships and detonate them in Houston, San Fransciso, New York, Washington&#8230;etc&#8230;etc.  and America will be bankrupt.</p>
<p>Good plan Democrats.  Lets be sure to play to your base on Afghanistan and cross our fingers that Obama can work out a deal with the nuclear armed Taliban.  Perhaps he could offer then Sharia law in all those red states that didnt vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93430</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93430</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
“You’re taking a little teaspoonful of water out of the ocean while you’re dumping a whole river in,” Republican Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire said. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pretty clear, accurate description

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The budget seeks $533.8 billion for the Defense Department, excluding war costs, reflecting a 2 percent real increase when adjusted for inflation. That compares with an average 4 percent annual real increase under Bush. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wonder who&#039;s gonna get hurt from that.  Probably the Soldiers - typical under Dem leadership</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
“You’re taking a little teaspoonful of water out of the ocean while you’re dumping a whole river in,” Republican Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire said.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty clear, accurate description</p>
<blockquote><p>
The budget seeks $533.8 billion for the Defense Department, excluding war costs, reflecting a 2 percent real increase when adjusted for inflation. That compares with an average 4 percent annual real increase under Bush.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wonder who&#8217;s gonna get hurt from that.  Probably the Soldiers &#8211; typical under Dem leadership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93413</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93413</guid>
		<description>Our spender-in-chief, using next decades money, today.  now THATS Progressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our spender-in-chief, using next decades money, today.  now THATS Progressive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93384</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93384</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ridiculous.  I&#039;m just surprised that Obama decided to cut anything.  He has his majority in both houses why bother with budget cuts.  2013 can&#039;t get here soon enough.  I just hope we&#039;ll have some semblance of the economy we used to have so one day we can fix Obama&#039;s mess.  Lyn fromwembleypark.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous.  I&#8217;m just surprised that Obama decided to cut anything.  He has his majority in both houses why bother with budget cuts.  2013 can&#8217;t get here soon enough.  I just hope we&#8217;ll have some semblance of the economy we used to have so one day we can fix Obama&#8217;s mess.  Lyn fromwembleypark.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c3</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/05/07/obama-makes-a-joke-proposes-useless-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-93381</link>
		<dc:creator>c3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=13792#comment-93381</guid>
		<description>Death by a thousand little cuts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death by a thousand little cuts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
